Infiltrator

I think InSSIder main purpose is to troubleshoot wireless signals issues. If you want to get someone to connect to your wireless use Pineapple instead. What is InSSider http://www.metageek.net/products/inssider What is Pineapple http://revision3.com/hak5/pineapples

No need to apologize its perfectly normal to ask questions. I checked the compatibility between your board and CPU, it should work without any issues. Since your motherboard has support for 6 cores CPU you can always upgrade to that in the future. You current CPU supports virtualization, so you shouldn't have problems running any virtual machines. The only thing, I did't like much about this CPU, is that it doesn't seem to support hyperThreading, which most Intel Xeon CPUs does. Are you running dual processors or just a single processor on the board?

What happens when you turn your computer on? Does it display anything on the screen? Does it beap? Are you also able to post your computer specs? Like what type of motherboard, ram, cpu you bought.

I don't want rain on your parade, but you shouldn't have posted a public ip address, its against the forum rules. Secondly brute forcing a FTP server, will either result in the account being locked out or your ip address being banned, you might want to keep that in mind. Last but not least, here is list of "FTP Brute Forcing Tools" I found by doing a simple Google Search. http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&source=hp&biw=1024&bih=485&q=http+brute+force&aq=1&aqi=g6&aql=&oq=http+brute+&gs_rfai=&fp=b774ebd60b7aa5e4 http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&biw=1024&bih=485&&sa=X&ei=YK8RTfjiB4zCccbc8OgD&ved=0CBUQvwUoAQ&q=FTP+brute+force&spell=1&fp=b774ebd60b7aa5e4

QOS is only used for prioritizing traffic that demands high bandwidth, like Skype, video conferencing and IP phones. It doesn't necessarily make your connection go faster.

I could see some really good results, if you had a SSD, an I7 CPU and a nvdia graphics card. Those 8 hours would turn into a couple of hours or less. You might want to look into upgrading your gear.

See I've always had my doubts on the technology, I had a feeling a day like that would come. We all know that technology offers a lot of wonders, makes our day to day lives easier. But there are certainly things we really need to look out for, especially when connecting devices to a network or to the internet. If I were to connect things like a TV or BlueRay player to the internet, I would at least segment my network, or make a separate network specifically for connecting devices like TV, Xbox and etc. So that way, if a hacker manages to compromise my TV, the second part of my network would remain isolated from any attacks.

I texted my college a message last night, I am just waiting for his reply.

I agree I don't see how this Government internet filter plan is going to work out. Here in Australia, whether the ISP/User like or not, it will be required by law to have it.

Out of curiosity, how did you set up squid? As a transparent proxy, or as web cache proxy If Squid is configured as a transparent proxy, you are not required to enter any proxy settings on your browser. However if you configured squid as a web cache, you will need to specify the port and the ip address of squid server, within your browser proxy settings. If you wouldn't mind, are you able to provide a copy of your squid config file?

Last year I went to a colleges house to play a bit of guitar with him, and he showed a software that he uses to do all the background effects, but I can't remember from the top of my head, whats called. Will get in contact with him and find out for you.

"THE UK Government is to combat the early sexualization of children by blocking internet pornography unless parents request it, it was revealed today." Its a good thing that, its not a mandatory filter, its up to the end user if she/he wants to have porn sites blocked or not "It follows the success of an operation by most British internet service providers (ISPs) to prevent people inadvertently viewing child porn websites. Ministers want companies to use similar technology to shut out adult pornography from children. Pornography sites will be blocked at source unless people specifically ask to view them." Wish we had this same system here in Australia.

THE UK Government is to combat the early sexualization of children by blocking internet pornography unless parents request it, it was revealed today. The move is intended to ensure that children are not exposed to sex as a routine by-product of the internet. It follows warnings about the hidden damage being done to children by sex sites. The biggest broadband providers, including BT, Virgin Media and TalkTalk, are being called to a meeting next month by Ed Vaizey, the communications minister, and will be asked to change how pornography gets into homes. Instead of using parental controls to stop access to pornography - so-called "opting out" - the tap will be turned off at source. Adults will then have to "opt in." The new initiative is in advance of the imminent convergence of the internet and television on one large screen in the living room. It follows the success of an operation by most British internet service providers (ISPs) to prevent people inadvertently viewing child porn websites. Ministers want companies to use similar technology to shut out adult pornography from children. Pornography sites will be blocked at source unless people specifically ask to view them. TalkTalk, which includes Tiscali and the British version of Aol.com, is already introducing a new free service early next year called "bright feed," which allows people to control the internet so that all devices are automatically covered without the need to set up individual controls. Homeowners can either specify which adult sites they want to receive or put a cinema-style classification on their feed to restrict what is received according to age ranges, such as U, 12 or 18. A survey by Psychologies magazine this summer found that one in three children aged 10 in Britain had viewed pornography on the net. Mr Vaizey said: "This is a very serious matter. I think it is very important that it's the ISPs that come up with solutions to protect children. "I'm hoping they will get their acts together so we don't have to legislate, but we are keeping an eye on the situation and we will have a new communications bill in the next couple of years." Claire Perry, the Tory MP for Devizes and a keen lobbyist for more restrictions, said: "Unless we show leadership, the internet industry is not going to self-regulate. The minister has said he will get the ISPs together and say, 'Either you clean out your stables or we are going to do it for you'." "There is this very uneasy sense for parents of children that we do not have to tolerate this Wild West approach. We are not coming at this from an anti-porn perspective. We just want to make sure our children aren't stumbling across things we don't want them to see." Previously the Internet Services Providers' Association (ISPA) has told MPs that such a blanket ban would be expensive and technically difficult to operate. But Miranda Suit, co-founder of the charity Safermedia, which held a conference on internet porn at the Commons last month, said: "Technically we know it can be done because the ISPs are already removing child porn after the government put pressure on them. "In the past, internet porn was regarded as a moral issue or a matter of taste. Now it has become a mental health issue because we now know the damage it is causing. We are seeing perverse sexual behavior among children. Legislation is both justifiable and feasible." She quoted the example of two underage brothers sentenced to at least five years' detention this year for a sadistic sex attack on two other boys in South Yorkshire. The brothers were said to have had a "toxic" home life where they were exposed to pornography. This weekend some ISPs appeared ready to introduce an "opt in" clause voluntarily. Andrew Heaney, executive director of strategy and regulation for TalkTalk, said: "Our objective was not to do what the politicians want us to do but to do what was right by our customers. "If other companies aren't going to do it of their own volition, then maybe they should be leant on. Legislation is a sledgehammer but it could work." A spokeswoman for Virgin Media said: "We already have an opt-in approach on mobiles. We've taken this approach as mobiles are taken out of the home - and kept in a pocket - whereas parents can control what happens within the home and online "We're able to block sites, so it would be possible to do the same on the internet. It is just about finding the right approach." A spokesman for BT, which has a "clean feed" system to block access to illegal sites, said: "We do what we can to protect children." The ISPA did not return calls to London's Sunday Times. Source: http://www.news.com.au/technology/all-internet-porn-will-be-blocked-to-protect-children-under-uk-government-plan/story-e6frfro0-1225973501259

He could be using it for anything. A college of mine from work, he just built a 100TB storage nas device at home, in a Raid 10 configuration running inside a virtual machine.

I am pretty sure he knows, I didn't post the URL because he is incapable of looking for it, on the contrary he is very capable, and smart. I was just trying to help Mr-Protocol.

Yeah I always wondered it myself too. Theoretically speaking I don't think its possible. You should know that most of the things, we see in films its not entirely possible. Hollywood always throws some special effects to make us believe its real. The only theory I can think of, is they somehow have shot that scene at different angles and then with the aid of a software embedded together, a bit like Microsoft Panorama Stitcher where you can create a picture in 3D.

In your computer how long would it take to encode a blue ray film?

have you visited this website http://www.fcc.gov/

OMG, this fucking idiot is everywhere.

What the fucker, is going on in here?

Are you are spammer, cause what you posted does not relate to the thread.

Encoding videos, music and other multimedia tasks demands a lot of processing power. And in order to use Nvidia Cuda, the software will need to be optimized to take advantage of the Cuda cores. I know for a fact that, Cyberlink PowerDiretor has been optimized for Cuda. You can check it out, at this link http://www.cyberlink.com/products/powerdirector/features_en_US.html Also if you want to get good encoding performance out of your machine, you may want to look into upgrading your CPU to a faster one, as well as perhaps upgrade your HDD to a SSD.

I don't know if you guys have seen this, but I find it awesome. http://www.mini-itx.com/projects/cauv2008/default.asp?page=1

I thought about that as well, but usually an IP camera would be quite heavy compared to an USB webcam. Now the issue I have with the USB web-cameras is connectivity. They need to be connected to a computer, in order to function as opposed to an IP camera which operates as a standalone device. In order for the USB webcams to work, I was thinking of placing a netbook on-board of the RC car, but that brings another issue, weight!!!. Unless the RC car is a monster truck or a is bigger enough vehicle to accommodate the netbook that won't be possible. I then did a bit of thinking, on how to eliminate the netbook off the equation and considered in building a small and light enough computer, using an ITX motherboard like this one http://www.mini-itx.com/ And the convenient part I like most about this mobo is that it has 4 USB connectors, which covers exactly the number of cameras the car will need, in order for me to drive it around. Anyway will keep you guys posted with the progress of the project.