DigitalTinker Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Is it possible to have a web server on the network side of the Packet Squirrel? It would be nice to create a tool similar to the NetScout NetSprinter that could be used for network diagnostics including LLDP. Could you attach a wireless adapter and have it run an access point as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundhaug92 Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 I'd think so. I'm not so sure about adding a wireless adapter but you could run it in NAT-mode and add a pineapple on the client-side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-ee Jones Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 A wireless adapter would be interesting, as the PS is (sadly) lacking a WiFi/BLE module. Not sure if the PS can create it's own network or not though, as it looks to be mainly pass-through (like the LAN Turtle). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundhaug92 Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 6 hours ago, Dave-ee Jones said: A wireless adapter would be interesting, as the PS is (sadly) lacking a WiFi/BLE module. Not sure if the PS can create it's own network or not though, as it looks to be mainly pass-through (like the LAN Turtle). The PacketSquirrel* supports working as a router, that's the NETMODE NAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-ee Jones Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 2 minutes ago, sundhaug92 said: The turtle supports working as a router, that's the NETMODE NAT. You're saying they use the same functions? E.g. NETMODE. I'm not overly familiar with the LAN Turtle, as I don't have one. Getting a PS though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebkinne Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 3 minutes ago, Dave-ee Jones said: You're saying they use the same functions? E.g. NETMODE. I'm not overly familiar with the LAN Turtle, as I don't have one. Getting a PS though! No, but the outcome is the same. NETMODE NAT is what the LAN Turtle's default network is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundhaug92 Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 5 minutes ago, Dave-ee Jones said: You're saying they use the same functions? E.g. NETMODE. I'm not overly familiar with the LAN Turtle, as I don't have one. Getting a PS though! Sorry, meant the PacketSquirrel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundhaug92 Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 NETMODE on the packetsquirrel is kinda like ATTACKMODE on the bashbunny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-ee Jones Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 4 minutes ago, Sebkinne said: No, but the outcome is the same. NETMODE NAT is what the LAN Turtle's default network is. So the functions are called the same way? E.g. NETMODE NAT on a LAN Turtle does the same as on a PS. 2 minutes ago, sundhaug92 said: NETMODE on the packetsquirrel is kinda like ATTACKMODE on the bashbunny Yeah that was my initial thought when I saw it on Darren's post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebkinne Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Just now, Dave-ee Jones said: So the functions are called the same way? E.g. NETMODE NAT on a LAN Turtle does the same as on a PS. No. The LAN Turtle doesn't have a "NETMODE" command. But the way the LAN Turtle has it's networking setup can be achieved by running "NETMODE NAT" on the PS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-ee Jones Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Just now, Sebkinne said: No. The LAN Turtle doesn't have a "NETMODE" command. But the way the LAN Turtle has it's networking setup can be achieved by running "NETMODE NAT" on the PS. Ah, okay, that makes sense. Sorry so many baby steps had to be taken, ha. Friday afternoon getting to me. On the bright side, weekend.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundhaug92 Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 9 minutes ago, Dave-ee Jones said: Ah, okay, that makes sense. Sorry so many baby steps had to be taken, ha. Friday afternoon getting to me. On the bright side, weekend.. Probably didn't help I mixed up the two, sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.