hsncorrosion Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Could you make your own .com like extension? For example www.site.hak or www.site.msn, etc? I would use a dns server right? If this is possible will it work online, lan, or both? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Can't be done. ICANN decides this stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 It could be done for just your own LAN, but no one else could see it so it would be a bit pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deveant Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 the joys of a DNS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omega_ion Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Unless he's on a huge corporate LAN or college network Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted March 10, 2007 Share Posted March 10, 2007 the joys of a DNS Correction: The joys of America controlled DNS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hsncorrosion Posted March 10, 2007 Author Share Posted March 10, 2007 ok, thanks But for the hell of it if you did want to use it on a lan how would you go about doing so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deveant Posted March 10, 2007 Share Posted March 10, 2007 its kinda been mentioned 2x now, and even on the latest ep, u need to set up a DNS server on ur network. or if u wanna go the cheap way, change the windows 'HOST' file on all PCs to point the adrress to ur IP, such as the line would be www.BigBalls.com 127.0.0.1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaKo Posted March 10, 2007 Share Posted March 10, 2007 Using BIND you could have your own TLD locally, I have <hostname>.koa-ti on mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychoaliendog Posted March 10, 2007 Share Posted March 10, 2007 Well, yes you could have your own TLD, you'd just have to run your own root DNS Server. Like all these fine folks. Just nobody would use it, except you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren Kitchen Posted March 10, 2007 Share Posted March 10, 2007 We could always sponsor our own .hack TLD like many of these fine organizations have: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponsored_top-level_domain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deveant Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 haha a .xxx would be kinda kool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 haha a .xxx would be kinda kool There are some good arguments against it. More than there are for it anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 There are some good arguments against it. More than there are for it anyway. I still don't understand how the Christians woman group didn't relies they must be doing some thing wrong if they are agreeing with the porn industry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonlit Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 There are some good arguments against it. More than there are for it anyway. I still don't understand how the Christians woman group didn't relies they must be doing some thing wrong if they are agreeing with the porn industry. Simple: move all porn to .xxx, then block all .xxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deveant Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 aye thats y i heard it was a good thing. They wanted to make it all Mature content had to be on .xxx otherwise it would break the law, then all ppl who didnt want ppl to view the content had to do was simply block the TLD .xxx makes things easier, and safer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 aye thats y i heard it was a good thing. They wanted to make it all Mature content had to be on .xxx otherwise it would break the law, then all ppl who didnt want ppl to view the content had to do was simply block the TLD .xxx makes things easier, and safer. And you think requiring all content that someone arbitrarily decides is mature content to be on the .xxx TLD is a good thing do you? Don't see any problems arising there with classification or enforcement? If I say cunt is that mature content? Would this site have to move to .xxx now because it has mature content on it? If it isn't mandatory it's useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deveant Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 no but if u posted ur genitals then it should be removed because this isnt a .xxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Simple: move all porn to .xxx, then block all .xxx Well ye, the porn industry didn't want it because it would be easy to block all there sites. The woman's group didn't want it because 'it would be easier to find porn'. I don't see how the woman's group didn't see there own stupidity. I mean, some thing is obviously wrong if they are wanting what the porn industry wants (since they would much rather the porn industry not exist), and then it only takes another few seconds of thought to work out why it's wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 this thread has turned into descussing how to deliver prono down the tubes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 no but if u posted ur genitals then it should be removed because this isnt a .xxx So medical sites should be .xxx then? How about sites with artistic nudes? Do you think it would be simple come come up with a clear line between what is porn and what isn't for an international medium like the Internet? Apart from that what happens if I want to post an image that could be considered porn on my personal site not host on a .xxx (regardless for what reason)? Does my site get taken down? Whose job is it to police the entire the non-.xxx web for porn? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaKo Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 Or what about a blog where you decided to post about the extremely good sex you had last night? Suddenly your breaking the law. There should be a .xxx, but I don't think it should mean anything. I would buy vako.xxx though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.