Jump to content

Microsoft Live.com running Mac OS?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Its not MAC OS:

GET HTTP://65.54.179.248 HTTP/1.0



HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Connection: close

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:18:41 GMT

Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0

PPServer: PPV: 30 H: BAYPPLOGN2B14 V: 0

X-Powered-By: ASP.NET

Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1

Expires: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:17:41 GMT

Cache-Control: no-cache

Pragma: no-cache

P3P: CP="DSP CUR OTPi IND OTRi ONL FIN"

Set-Cookie: MSPRequ=lt=1172474321&co=1&id=N; path=/;version=1

Set-Cookie: MSPOK=uuid-d7424590-8a4d-4493-ab90-8bed4af4511a; domain=login.live.com;path=/;version=1

Connection: Keep-Alive

Content-Length: 8080



<!-- ServerInfo: BAYPPLOGN2B14 2006.10.31.02.02.43 Live1 Unknown LocVer:0 -->

<!-- PreprocessInfo: ppbuild:PASSBLD08, Tue 10:31:2006- 1:25:00.19 -- Version: 4,500,6241,0 -->

Guest TehHacks
Posted

I knew that it was probably inaccurate, but it was a funny inaccuracy :P:P

Posted
I did 6 fingerprints on Live.com and 3 said Mac, 2 said Windows Server and 1 said unknown.

EDIT: not 5 fingerprints, 6 fingerprints

What are you using to do this?

Guest TehHacks
Posted

t0f? in use p0f, whats the difference. googled but loads of Chinese pages came up :S

Guest TehHacks
Posted
i meant p0f. try typing after not sleeping for 3 days!!! :evil:

Well thats the price us geeks have to pay for 24 hour Internet accesses :P

Posted

I would really doubt live.com on OS X, but i did read somewhere, probably just as inaccurate, that msn.com and other MS assets in fact use Linux based firewalls and that scans were showing up as Linux.

That would be pretty funny

Posted

Well I don't know about that, however I don;t know if it's been changed but when they bought hotmail they tried to replace the Sun boxes with exchange. It was unable to take the load and they put the Sun boxes back. This ihas likely changed now though.

Posted
An older MS internal whitepaper from August 2000 on switching Hotmail, which MS acquired in 1997, from front-end servers running FreeBSD and back-end database servers running Solaris to a whole farm running Win2K, reads like a veritable sales brochure for UNIX, but concludes that the company ought to set the right example by ensuring that each division "should eat its own dogfood."

The whitepaper, by MS Windows 2000 Server Product Group member David Brooks, has been posted on the Web by Security Office, which says it discovered the item and numerous other confidential MS documents on a poorly protected server. There are a number of other fascinating documents posted, in which the careful reader will find a veritable treasure map for hacking the citadel, but the one I enjoyed best was the comparison between Win2K and UNIX.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/21/ms_paper_touts_unix/

http://www.securityoffice.net/mssecrets/hotmail.html

Worth a read. I wouldn't be suprised if MS used solaris and sun kit to be honest, nothing Microsoft has is really in the big iron class of OS.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...