kickarse

I don't remember how to setup IIS's FTP. What I do remember is that it wasn't very robust and we ended up going with a 3rd party program. Make sure that Anonymous FTP authentication is OFF. Create a user group that has access to that resource only, through the IIS Snap-In. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechn...0.mspx?mfr=true http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServe...3.mspx?mfr=true http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServe...3.mspx?mfr=true http://support.microsoft.com/kb/812614 We did use only IIS FTP for a while successfully. But, I don't remember how we set it up. Just found this http://www.whenpenguinsattack.com/2006/02/...-6-ftp-service/

The problem for me is they never really taught me anything I didn't already know from 6th grade on...

^^ Something like Pn3um0n0ul+r4m1crO5copIcsilicovo|c@noconio or su|DerK4|aFraga|1s+iCe3pial@dOciou$

Easiest thing to do is let your router give DHCP addresses for your internal lan for that scope. Give your Win2k3 box an IP, subnet, and gateway that is correct for you to be able to get on the internet with the Win2k3 box. Setup a workstation (do not join a domain, just a workgroup) that gets DHCP from the router and check that you can get on the internet. Make sure it's IP is in the same subnet and IP range of the Win2k3 box. Setup a new install of Win2k3 Enterprise of Business Editions. Setup AD as described in the following... http://www.petri.co.il/how_to_install_acti...indows_2003.htm Make sure you have an administrator account that's a domain admin. One that has the ability to add computers to the network. Then on the workstation go into where you change of the name of the computer. Go into the "more" button and change the Primary DNS suffix to the domain name you have, like CONTOSO.local. Because it wasn't an NT4 domain at one point you will join to the domain CONTOSO.local not CONTOSO, I believe. Have fun!

Happy to help... For 1... yes it's possible, but you don't want to do it. It really messes things up. Actually Win2k3 is the only version of windows server that's allowed changing of the domain name. For 2... yes that's correct :)

The router always supplies an external address that can be forwarded to the internal IP of the server. Easier way for now.. ---- > Router External IP and DNS assigned by ISP ---------------- ---- > Windows 2003 Enterprise or Business Server named "Server1" with a DNS suffix of your AD Domain CONTOSO.local (the tutorials from Microsoft says CONTOSO.local), IP 192.168.1.2 ------- > DHCP with scope of 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.100, Subnet 255.255.255.0, Gateway 192.168.1.1 (Router), DNS 192.168.1.2 (Itself) ------- > Primary DNS Suffix should be whatever you setup your AD Domain as ------- > DNS (on 192.168.1.2) setup with a Forwarder of whatever your ISP provided for DNS | Forward (CONTOSO.local) and Reverse (192.168.1) lookup Zones should have been created when you installed AD ---------------- ---- > Workstations should have the Primary DNS suffix of whatever your domain is | Workstation name "workstation1" DNS suffix "CONTOSO.local" ------- > Assigned IP by DHCP, should show up in the MMC Snap-In on the server for DHCP ------- > The DNS Snap-In on the server should show that "workstation1.CONTOSO.local" has been resolved in the Forward/Reverse Zone and the server itself has been resolved ------------------------------ hmmm... that site really helps though explain it much better than I can. Hope it helps.

^^ yeah I thought you were going to have a seisure... Just surprised you didn't know about that...

140 Pounds... not Dollars

Mubix - The Fix... http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS4434907782.html http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost....25&SiteID=1 http://jepstone.net/blog/?p=544 http://www.builderau.com.au/blogs/codemonk...htm?p=339270746 And Why.. http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/03/31/opsys_aadchcgagd_hf/

torrent = free .. but its hard to find one which isnt the beat >.> I didn't say I paid $400 for it 8)

Business Ed.? Yeah I was thinking of doing the same thing once all the drivers are out for Vista. But who know, it'll probably run the same. The effects don't get in the way like I thought they would.

Just curious if anyone else has used Vista? I just installed Vista Ultimate on my laptop (TurionX2 1.6ghz, 1gb DDR, 100gb SATA) and damn it was fast. I was able to have the the "eye candy" and it was very nice. It installed faster than XP, most drivers were installed. But I couldn't get my wireless to work. BUT, it different. Very different. It's like going from XP to Ubuntu. After a little bit I was able to get into everything and all was good, but still. It is NOT XP with a face lift. Though, it's not worth $400 for the Ultimate version. The eye candy was nice with it's blurring windows, 3d scrolling tabbing, etc. Just not worth it. For now I'll stick with my XP and Vista transformation pack 6.

If your server is internal you should not have an ip of 10.X.X.X If you have a small network your internal IP should be a class C IP. You also should setup DHCP to assign addresses within the same subnet/ip range. Simple setup for CORP.local AD domain ---> Router - External IP of 10.X.X.X - Internal IP 192.168.1.1 ---> W2K3 R2 - Internal IP of 192.168.1.2 |Subnet 255.255.255.0 |Gateway 192.168.1.1 | DNS to 192.168.1.2 ---> DHCP Scope of 192.168.1.3-254 | DNS Domain of CORP.local | DNS Server is 192.168.1.2 | Gateway 192.168.1.1 | Subnet 255.255.255.0 ---> DNS - Forward lookup of your CORP.local domain and Reverse lookup of 192.168.1 | Forwarders to the Router IP I believe ---> Set your workstations to use the NETBios name CORP.local and be on DHCP. Make sure your workstations are Windows XP Professional or 2000 Pro. Home will not join a domain. A good place for tutorials is www.petri.co.il

If each program has a command line way of updating than you can schedule a batch script to do that... http://www.fpschultze.de/batstuff.html http://www.robvanderwoude.com/ http://www.allenware.com/icsw/icswidx.htm http://www.wilsonmar.com/1wsh.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batch_file and most importantly http://www.google.com/search?q=batch+scrip...lient=firefox-a

Background image from Mandolux on Flickr

The matrix beckons...

Yeah, I was. Yeah, I was talking about the cast not the producer/director/writer.

2.0? lol... let's just get on the topic of good design instead of rehashing what we've regurgitated from other sites that _tell_ us what good design is. I think you've read too many digg.com articles on "web 2.0 styling". Maybe this one http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/web-2....style-guide.cfm The point of design is to break barriers and boundries, but, it still takes skill and talent to do that. The thing is that hak5 is shiny and polished. It's raw and blunt.

Possible background change, made search larger...

Yeah just going with brown... perhaps a beige would be better? or a darker brown... or black...

How about this? Oh I don't have the fonts you used for the logo. Do you have the original psd with the banner?

More prominent eh? I'll see what I can whip up 8)

Thought i'd do a little play on the brown theme. Just a first rendition/iteration.

Test tube babies just don't get the same lovin' that normal ones do...