avaton Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 hello guyz,i have a question.... so,can i put a .exe file into a .jpg.so as to if i open the jpg will open the .exe too. can it be possible? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 so,can i put a .exe file into a .jpg.so as to if i open the jpg will open the .exe too. Won't work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Impossible! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Impossible! Are we suddenly in a episode of Doctor Who? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Impossible! Are we suddenly in a episode of Doctor Who? Quick! We have to get to the Tardis! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunderboy Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 There are a very limited amount of uses for what you asking for. You can hide other shit in a file by using that steghide or what ever it 's called. I have never tried it but if my understanding of what the program does is right then you can hide stuff in a .jpg file. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avaton Posted July 5, 2007 Author Share Posted July 5, 2007 yes!so there isn't any way? :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Aside from the technicalities involved in this, I would actually refuse to help some one on this topic as there is no use for this that isn't malicious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jht129 Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 If this is what you are talking about: then you could rename it, changing the file extension, but I highly doubt that's what you are asking for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonlit Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 It's semi-possible. It's possible to make an image execute malicious code using certain exploits I won't describe here. As for embedding the exe in the jpg and still have it executable (ie: not steganography)? Not sure, don't think it's been done and if it has I haven't heard of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freakish Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 You could easily make it look like a .jpg on your computer, but it won't actually be one. Name the file "whatever.jpg.exe" then just enable hide known file extentions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 *sigh* Find a vulnerability in the windows jpeg rendering library then you can do exactly what you want. Does no one remember that windows rides the short bus? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonlit Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 *sigh* Find a vulnerability in the windows jpeg rendering library then you can do exactly what you want. Does no one remember that windows rides the short bus? It's semi-possible. It's possible to make an image execute malicious code using certain exploits I won't describe here. Wut? ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Wut? ;) Exactly! We need the short bus clip! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeoneE1se Posted July 8, 2007 Share Posted July 8, 2007 Wut? ;) Exactly! We need the short bus clip! "Today we have a special Operating System... and when I say special I mean it rides the short bus." -- Darren Kitchen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jht129 Posted July 8, 2007 Share Posted July 8, 2007 I have a keylogger program that does this, it binds its installation package to any file you want (jpg in your case) and when the person u send the file to opens that file, the program is installed on their computer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HzunUGlE3R5IuRK2cvnv5 Posted July 8, 2007 Share Posted July 8, 2007 Impossible! Are we suddenly in a episode of Doctor Who? Quick! We have to get to the Tardis! I know it is bigger on the inside, but does everyone have to go in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeoneE1se Posted July 8, 2007 Share Posted July 8, 2007 I have a keylogger program that does this, it binds its installation package to any file you want (jpg in your case) and when the person u send the file to opens that file, the program is installed on their computer.I think it needs to be an exe file to start with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avaton Posted July 8, 2007 Author Share Posted July 8, 2007 I have a keylogger program that does this, it binds its installation package to any file you want (jpg in your case) and when the person u send the file to opens that file, the program is installed on their computer. i know this about keylogger my friend.but i want to do it without putting in keylogger!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Ewing Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 j peg file has no executable areas. There is an exploit that would force executable data into the operating system when a jpeg was viewed, but that isn't the same as merging the files. The fact of the matter is, if you name a file pron.jpg.exe, windows will show it was pron.jpg. The merger you've used will even change the icon so they might not even realize. Outlook express will probably warn about it, as might some others, but most people are idiots. So they double click and see the porn while the "whatever-the-hell" you're sending him runs in the background. omg i get it now! thats the best exploit ever! EDIT: oy ya and is there a way to display it on a website so they see a picture or the file just exectues once they go to the site? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeoneE1se Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 j peg file has no executable areas. There is an exploit that would force executable data into the operating system when a jpeg was viewed, but that isn't the same as merging the files. The fact of the matter is, if you name a file pron.jpg.exe, windows will show it was pron.jpg. The merger you've used will even change the icon so they might not even realize. Outlook express will probably warn about it, as might some others, but most people are idiots. So they double click and see the porn while the "whatever-the-hell" you're sending him runs in the background. omg i get it now! thats the best exploit ever! EDIT: oy ya and is there a way to display it on a website so they see a picture or the file just exectues once they go to the site? I would just like to point out almost everyone who's going to look to see if it's a jpeg to start with will have 'hide known extensions' un-checked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunex Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 I would just like to point out almost everyone who's going to look to see if it's a jpeg to start with will have 'hide known extensions' un-checked And thusly we have established that "hide known extensions" === "user is an idiot" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyzBong Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 I have heard of such "EXE Binders", being used to combine animated greeting-card software and trojan horse servers. Wikipedia "File Binder". As far as a *.jpeg file being binded with an *.exe ... I do have to admit; I have downloaded such a program. Anti-Virus caught it and I decided not to test it out. DLL Injections are cooler anyways. - AndyzBong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Ewing Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 j peg file has no executable areas. There is an exploit that would force executable data into the operating system when a jpeg was viewed, but that isn't the same as merging the files. The fact of the matter is, if you name a file pron.jpg.exe, windows will show it was pron.jpg. The merger you've used will even change the icon so they might not even realize. Outlook express will probably warn about it, as might some others, but most people are idiots. So they double click and see the porn while the "whatever-the-hell" you're sending him runs in the background. omg i get it now! thats the best exploit ever! EDIT: oy ya and is there a way to display it on a website so they see a picture or the file just exectues once they go to the site? I would just like to point out almost everyone who's going to look to see if it's a jpeg to start with will have 'hide known extensions' un-checked SomeoneE1se it is genius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.