Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As can be gleaned from the write-up, your program is essentially EncFS with 1 difference:

Where EncFS uses FUSE to present the encrypted files in unencrypted form to the OS, which limits its use to UNIX-like platforms, your product uses its own self-written and locally operating IPv4-only WebDAV server which the OS can then access, making the concept available to non-UNIX (=Windows) platforms.

It would make sense to have a performance comparison between TrueCrypt and your solution. I'm sure it's a little slower than EncFS due to the localhost network connection, but not by a large margin, so comparing those two wouldn't add much. The rest is pretty much described in the page you've linked.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...