C3PBRO Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Yea, so reaver is relatively slow and outdated compared to the Bully Project... https://github.com/bdpurcell/bully There is support for OpenWrt, so I'm just wondering what would be involved to get it ported over to the Mark V? I have some free time on my hands... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesugarat Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 It's already been ported... I have a version I've been testing for a bit thanks to Garland and Sebkinne says they're working on an official one, but he can speak to how it's ranked on the overall schedule of projects to add to the pineapple. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Crimson Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 ::drools like a Pavlovian dog:: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
>script_kiddie Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 would love to be updated when the official release drops, Reaver jsut told me i only have to wait 2345:23:40 to try 10k+ pins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesugarat Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Hey, I love reaver as much as the next guy but not as much on the pineapple.... Don't get me wrong it works and it works well but the pineapple just doesn't have the same kind of processing power as using a laptop dedicated to Kali or BackTrack. So script_kiddie if you are going to use the pineapple for reaver at least make sure you have a really hot signal from the AP by either boosting your signal or getting really close to it. That way the processing power the pineapple is dedicating to reaver isn't wasted on a low signal. Just my 2cents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
levisiccard Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 Reaver is a great feature on the pineapple but it's also standard implemented in Kali Linux and it works great and fast there for me. On one of the routers i've <legitimately> tested the WPS pin was "12345670" !! This resulted in cracking a WPA2 passphrase in about 5 seconds (just mentioning it's the first pin reaver tries but i was stunned anyway) This was, by the way, on a bbox2 that was standard delivered from one of the biggest providers in Belgium, Belgacom. I was happy to report this and seemed lot's of these AP's had the same pin. The B-support posted to work on this. never tried bully and I am looking forward to test it on my pineapple so it would be nice if we were updated about this :-) Always happy to test new programs as I will be making my final end-work about wireless security next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masler77 Posted December 18, 2013 Share Posted December 18, 2013 does anyone know how it goes with bully? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C3PBRO Posted December 19, 2013 Author Share Posted December 19, 2013 (edited) does anyone know how it goes with bully? http://www.qfpost.co...e/d?g=XkyilXLhw After an "opkg install" you will find the binary in /usr/bin/ commands to make it run: airmon-ng start wlan1 ifconfig wlan1 down /usr/bin/bully -e whateverssid -F mon0 Credits to thesugarat and Garland for the .ipk Edited December 19, 2013 by C3PBRO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K4NE Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 (edited) But why is bully faster? Can someone tell me the main differences between Reaver and Bully that affects operatingspeed? Edited January 9, 2014 by K4NE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sailor Posted January 10, 2014 Share Posted January 10, 2014 (edited) But why is bully faster? Can someone tell me the main differences between Reaver and Bully that affects operatingspeed? Hard to tell without studying the source (https://github.com/bdpurcell/bully) but the author says the main differences with Reaver are: It has several advantages over the original reaver code. These include fewer dependencies, improved memory and cpu performance, correct handling of endianness, and a more robust set of options. It runs on Linux, and was specifically developed to run on embedded Linux systems (OpenWrt, etc) regardless of architecture. Edited January 10, 2014 by Sailor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
>script_kiddie Posted January 10, 2014 Share Posted January 10, 2014 Hey, I love reaver as much as the next guy but not as much on the pineapple.... Don't get me wrong it works and it works well but the pineapple just doesn't have the same kind of processing power as using a laptop dedicated to Kali or BackTrack. So script_kiddie if you are going to use the pineapple for reaver at least make sure you have a really hot signal from the AP by either boosting your signal or getting really close to it. That way the processing power the pineapple is dedicating to reaver isn't wasted on a low signal. Just my 2cents. This is very true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xcellerator Posted January 10, 2014 Share Posted January 10, 2014 I've been testing out Bully on several networks. The only downside I can see is that it doesn't seem to realise when WPS isn't enabled and just constantly spams the AP with pin attempts. Although it's pretty obvious when you see the same pin tried over and over again, that it isn't gonna work, it would be nice if it would stop itself, LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesugarat Posted January 10, 2014 Share Posted January 10, 2014 (edited) Sounds like it doesn't catch on to AP Rate Limiting like reaver does.... Edited January 10, 2014 by thesugarat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xcellerator Posted January 10, 2014 Share Posted January 10, 2014 Yeah, tbh both Bully and Reaver have their pros and cons. Seeing as bully is maintained more than reaver (which isn't hard, lets be honest!), hopefully they'll add some features in a patch.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest spazi Posted January 10, 2014 Share Posted January 10, 2014 I've used Reaver for a long time and it's one of my main go-to tools for hacking wifi AP's.I haven't used Bully that much, but it seemed to me that it was "better" in some ways. I still do use Reaver a lot though :) I Also recently installed RfA (Reaver for Android) Only works on phones with the BCM4329/4330 chipset. A little buggy, but works alright. Mind you, Bully has just been updated. And I'm hoping for a Android port! :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesugarat Posted January 11, 2014 Share Posted January 11, 2014 Even if bully doesn't have the option reaver does.... Not sure what would happen to the router. Interesting idea though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesugarat Posted January 11, 2014 Share Posted January 11, 2014 reaver definitely works on the pineapple. It even has an infusion again thanks to Whistle Master, but it runs perfectly fine over ssh using the normal commands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.