Jump to content

deathwarder

Active Members
  • Posts

    103
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by deathwarder

  1. well, I like to map out nearby wireless networks, and signal strength is useful for that. Is u3 really necessary for this? EDIT: I have a choice of these drives, which have u3? Does kingston u3 work with the switchblade? What would you recommend? My budget really only goes up to $45. These would be bought from a friend, so no shipping cost, and one day delivery. two kingston ones dtiu3 1gb $33 dtiu3ed 1gb 32 and a few sandisk ones (faster) Mini cruser's SDCZ6-1024-A10 $44 SDCZ6-2048-A10 $70 Titanium's SDCZ7-1024-A10 $55 SDCZ7-2048-A10 $87
  2. deathwarder

    wzcook

    thanks, with this I have been able to speed up my wireless detection batch, thanks!
  3. ok, Ive thought this out, and have some ideas. 1. To hide it, we can either have the batch set windows to hiding hidden files, or we can use a similiar approach to a rootkit. There are disadvantages to both options. The first can be seen by a smart user, while the second will be picked up by rootkit finders. 2. Ive been working on a few scripts that do some pretty cool stuff with wireless networks. Namely, they get the wireless key for the network you are currently connected to. They also retrieve the info required to decode the codes for surrounding networks, and their ssids(now, because this can take up to 2minutes per network, so Im not sure if I want to do it, or at least I might limit it to one network. It also retrieves type of security(wep, wpa, wpa2), and I am working on signal strength. 3.Now,I need someone to help me with this one, but I am using some tools from sysinternals(psexec to name one) to gather the same info from all computers in the network, maybe with a limit of 5 due to time constraints. 4.Finally, I am working on executing the batches in a different, more efficient order. Basicly, batches only go on to the next command after the first has been executed. With all of the addons I have been programming, the time is starting to hit a minute for a full execute. What I am doing now is making a pyramid organization like so: 1.Main batch A.First subbatch 1.Run programs section 1 2.Run programs section 2 B.Second subbatch 3.Run programs section 3 4.Run programs section 4 Basicly, with the number or programs starting to get close, and exceeding 16, this is the most efficient way to run them. The main batch starts the first and second subbatches, with very little overhead. Those batches run 4 more batches that each run 4 or more programs, creating very little waiting time.
  4. hmmm, I made a very efficient program in c++ that did just this, and was modular enough to work beyond 64bit numbers.
  5. thanks, Im going to contribute a bunch of packages Ive been working on as soon as I work out all of the kinks.
  6. using aircrack, and wzcook.exe in the bin folder, I was able to get wireless keys from the nearby networks. this might be the beginning of something....
  7. ok, heres how it works, first, create a batch file that shares the usb key on the network, then, sysinternals has a tool called psexec, this, when run with the proper parameters, will temporarily copy the payload(the info gathering tools) to all computers in the domain. It will then run them locally on the systems, and with some modified batch files, send the dump folder back to the now shared usb key. Finally, we can use another tool by sysinternals called sdelete that overwrites the payload a couple of times with random data on the remote machines. If we could get this working, for about 20seconds more time, we could collect all the data the usb drive currently collects, for all computers on the domain. I am also working on an addition to the payload that will use another coupld of tools from sysinternals called AccessChk, AccessEnum, PsFile, Autoruns, PsKill, psloglist, and some other programs from the pstools package.
  8. this could potentially be very dangerous. My netscan addon makes a list of computers, and psexec runs the payload on all computers, sending the data through either email or the usb key.
  9. I really need help with the net execute.
  10. Is there a way to force remote computers to execute programs? If so, by adding like 10seconds per computer, we could have every networked computer execute this. Something like usb port sharing might work.
  11. how about the network thing? What if there are 5 computers all sharing their roots over the network? Could similiar information be collected from them by plugging into one computer.
  12. is there a way to retrieve this same info from machintosh computers? Is there a way to retrieve things like lm hashes and internet history from networked computers that share their root?
  13. I just thought for better multitasking
  14. Is there a way to make a windows cluster that acts like openmosix?
  15. Does chaos configure itself? Or require vrey little configuration?
  16. hmm, one might be encrypted. I am working on a script that pulls encrypted packets from secure wireless networks and saves the raw data for later decoding, and gets the ssid for all nearby wifi networks.
  17. what are you using to uncompress them?
  18. thanks. I would like to know what distro you recommend for livecd clustering
  19. nope, lsass.exe sometimes detects these programs. It is almost a bigger problem than antivirus.
  20. sorry for the double post, but this is the last time for a while that Ill be able to work on it(1-2days). Ive made it so that it dumps the network info as previously described, and the batch to start auto-cracking and emailing is almost ready. It just bugs out at the last second. If anyone can tell me where to upload it tommorow that would b3e great. I based it off of the dssl payload.
  21. well multitasking will be better on a cluster right? Like I'll be able to have msword(crossover), rainbow generator, itunes(crossover), and quicktime all running at once on my soon to be 3 computer cluster right?
  22. for what? Hey, can anyone tell me where the lm hash is stored in the log file? I can't just run it because Im running windows vista.
  23. you will need a program to limit cpu usage.
×
×
  • Create New...