WAPHunter Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 -----BEGIN MESSAGE----- Version: PLP Personal 0.127 (0.9+A-/-z) 27jrOyL7dpqNTabUitcCyt1ZmsxyIIincDaY+VqtTUE3bmcGccP+ZcDybbcFHJ6E UpqO46UIqmcEDzeVtvxiK1btOREG1ktPULKNVlSTX2HVlsSqvUoM3GFoK9FSxzMO ZFPCzUAqmwZ6nIfmcDax1frQyu3IaFNSrbUimcBUA3YptRX3dcowo73//uSE+3bd qwCaK0hFNijG1crwBiQfgqTJ6vUiLvwMQIjuwo2p1/rNxyIIincCiMdcrt5m2bjL 8D6nAWttJ7EAim8BDt1/LvRDbNVqtTUE3bmcDax1bmtSTEGWqQBivE/VOxi7IgMN xyp1roxC23dcmcDUM5emsyX15FaJ44IAYrtBe91WrO4651XtPRiO1ZmwwUAIkuPS yt1jn8EDzfmFOBiEUZovgu3WmrswjEaVovZ7IG/FNhyImi -----END MESSAGE----- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAPHunter Posted February 25, 2010 Author Share Posted February 25, 2010 Really? Nobody? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infiltrator Posted April 2, 2010 Share Posted April 2, 2010 (edited) Is this password protected, or just a simple long phrase scrambled by ROT-13. Edited April 2, 2010 by Infiltrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAPHunter Posted August 9, 2011 Author Share Posted August 9, 2011 Is this password protected, or just a simple long phrase scrambled by ROT-13. Not password protected. Not ROT-13. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infiltrator Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 Not password protected. Not ROT-13. Some hint! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digip Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 It looks like standard Base-64, but after converting it, its not plain text, unless its a binary of some sort that has not headers. Almost looks like what you would see with a PGP signature, so encryption of some sort is my guess. The hash check against a "personal license password"? Have no idea. Clue would be nice though. Only thing I can find for "Version: PLP Personal 0.127 (0.9+A-/-z)" points to this site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAPHunter Posted August 10, 2011 Author Share Posted August 10, 2011 It looks like standard Base-64, but after converting it, its not plain text, unless its a binary of some sort that has not headers. Almost looks like what you would see with a PGP signature, so encryption of some sort is my guess. The hash check against a "personal license password"? Have no idea. Clue would be nice though. Only thing I can find for "Version: PLP Personal 0.127 (0.9+A-/-z)" points to this site. You are looking in the right direction. It will decode directly to plain text. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infiltrator Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 It won't be Base64 since I tried it and it won't decode to plain-text, so it has to be PGP signature or some other encryption type. Will keep on looking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digip Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 (edited) You are looking in the right direction. It will decode directly to plain text. Edit: Hmm. Well, its not eval gzinflated base-64. Checked that. And not x-byterun encoded. Edited August 10, 2011 by digip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAPHunter Posted August 10, 2011 Author Share Posted August 10, 2011 It won't be Base64 since I tried it and it won't decode to plain-text, so it has to be PGP signature or some other encryption type. Will keep on looking. It is not encrypted. It is not Base64, although it is "similar". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted_Account Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 It is not encrypted. It is not Base64, although it is "similar". It looks like a simple substitution cipher. Is this XOR? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAPHunter Posted August 10, 2011 Author Share Posted August 10, 2011 It looks like a simple substitution cipher. Is this XOR? Like I said, it is not encrypted nor does it require a password. I would consider XOR to be the most basic encryption since it uses another string - a password - to encode and decode it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Cooper Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 It looks to me like you have just used an alternate mapping from BASE64 characters (0-9,A-Z,a-z,+,/) to the binary strings they produce. If that is the case then it is cipher as your mapping is the key that takes the plain-text and produces the cipher text. Yes that does make standard BASE64 a cipher, the only difference being that the key is public knowledge for BASE64. Of course you may have done something different, but strangely enough I don't have the time to waste running a frequency analysis of an encrypted message on an Internet forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAPHunter Posted August 11, 2011 Author Share Posted August 11, 2011 ... Version: PLP Personal 0.127 (0.9+A-/-z) ... It looks to me like you have just used an alternate mapping from BASE64 characters (0-9,A-Z,a-z,+,/) ... Hmmmm, see any similarities there? It's not Base64'd. And really it's not encoded, it has been through a conversion - a change of representation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Cooper Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 If your (0.9+A-/-z) is a hint at the order of your mapping then that would make the binary something like 000010000111101111110111011001111110010110000111101001110101110110011000011110100110100111011111101110111001101000001101111110111001000001100100110010111000111101111110010011010011101110110011101000001110100110100011001010100000110110111001011110011111001111000011100111110010101000010001101000101000011010001010100100101000001110111110100111100111101000010000010010010100000110001111011111110101110110011001000100000110011111010011110110110010101000001111001110111111101010100000111001111011111101101110010101000001100111111001011001011100001111010001000001110000111001011010011111010110010101011000100000110001011101011110100010000010010010100000110001111000011101110110111011011111110100010111000011010001010000110100010101001001010000011101111101111111010111011001100100010000011010001101111111011111001011110110110010111100100100000110110011010011101011110010101000001110100110111101000001101011110111011011111110111010000011010011100110010000011000011101110111100111011111101110110010101000001100011111001011000011100011110101111001011100100010000011101001101000110100111100110100000111000011100101100101111010011101001111001010000011100111101001110110111100001101100110010101000000101101010000011000101110101111010001000001101000110111111100001100101110011011101011101100110110011110010100000110111011011111101110010110111011111100010111011011010011101111111010111100110100000010110101000001100101110111011000111101111110010011010011101110110011101000001101101110010111101001101000110111111001000101110010000010100111101111010110001000001110000110110011001011100001111001111001010100000111001111001011101110110010001000001100001110111001000001100101010110111011011100001110100111011000100000110110111001011110011111001111000011100111110010101000001110100110111101000001100111110010111001011101011110001111010001100001110110011011001100101110111011001111100101100000011001111101101110000111010011101100010111011000111101111110110101000001110111110100111101001101000010000011101001101000110010101000001110011111010111000101101010110010111000111110100010000001000101010000100110010100000100000100010011001011100011110111111001001100101010001001000001100001110111011001000100000110000101000001100010111001011010011100101110011001000001100100110010111100111100011111001011010011110000111010011010011101111110111001000001101111110011001000001111001110111111101011110010010000011001001100101110001111011111100100110100111011101100111010000011100001110010110111111000111100101111001111100110100000110100111011100100000111010011010001100101010000011000101101111110010011110010101110 and assuming 0.127 means 7 bit ASCII rather than 8 bit then the message would be ~v?'.f&N~w~r&.~&Nv:&F*n/>hPhTJ>OB.f">O6**~n*?."OV*b/"Jv"phPhTJ.f">/6/fN^*&z^:N2wN~v*^."&FO/''JNof*j/".7.fgJv~rn~6/j.v~&Nv:n/&F~"rzbf.*.v"r*nnNbn/>*&z>..^Fff.v>,>nNbv~j>O&B&F*.V."e&.~&*v" N.2&/O&N~r~2/&.~&Nv:~/Nr&F*~'J Now assuming that is not the message you intended, I have either misread your hints or have a bug in my decoding script. Of course you could always have bug in your encoding script :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAPHunter Posted August 11, 2011 Author Share Posted August 11, 2011 If your (0.9+A-/-z) is a hint at the order of your mapping ... and assuming 0.127 means ... ASCII ... Yes. As I said, basically the message will decode (convert) to plain text (ASCII) in english. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Cooper Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 So 27jr would become 000010 000111 101111 110111 which is 0000100 0011110 1111110 111 ignoring the last 3 bits for now is 4 30 126 which means you message starts <EOT Character> <Record Seperator Character> ~ Not very plain text really. Feel free to point out any mistakes in the decoding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAPHunter Posted August 11, 2011 Author Share Posted August 11, 2011 How 'bout this... Hello World == HBinOjFKxzAOZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infiltrator Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Why don't you show us how you encoded the message. I do have a feeling this message has not been encoded correctly or you are missing something from it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puzOpia Posted August 12, 2011 Share Posted August 12, 2011 Hey, you figured out my password! Damn, I thought it was long enough. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digip Posted August 12, 2011 Share Posted August 12, 2011 (edited) Instead of a character set of a-z, looks like we get (0.9+A-/-z) or 0123456789+ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ/abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz with case being taken into consideration for the shifting. Does not seem to be a simple rot shifting though. There are only a few repeating patterns, like "IIinc" so things could be in clumps of some manner or a custom lookup table for each letter and number of the alphabet, so "Hello World" might be a simple mapping of substituted values, allowing a space to actually be two letter values or certain letters to be double or triple valued shifts of patterns. (For example, Kenny speak uses a table where A = Mmm and a = mmm) Edited August 12, 2011 by digip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digip Posted August 12, 2011 Share Posted August 12, 2011 Hmm. tell me if I got any of the message so far. e royle dpq Tab UltcCytr mary IIllcDaY+Vqt TUESDAY GccP+ cDybbcWHJ6E Upqo46UIqmcEDleVtvrlorbtoREGrktPUlo VlSTA HVlaSqvUoMSGWoo9WSrlMo WPClUdqmw 6lIfmc Darrfr QyuSIaW Srb Ulmce UdSYpt RAS dcowoe S//uSE+Sbd qwCao0hW l GrcrwelQfgqTJ6vUllvwMQI uwo pr/r rtIllcClMdcrt5m b l 8D6ldWttJeEdlm8eDtr/lvRDb Vqt TUESDAY Darrbmt STEG WqQ elvE/VorleIgM ryprrorC Sdcmc DUM5e may Ar5 WaJ44 Id Yr tee9r Wro465rAt PRlor mwwUdIkuPS ytr l8EDlfmWoelEU ovguSWmraw EaVov eIG/W html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infiltrator Posted August 12, 2011 Share Posted August 12, 2011 I got some of your words but the message was not near enough to the real text. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAPHunter Posted August 12, 2011 Author Share Posted August 12, 2011 Hmm. tell me if I got any of the message so far. Not a single word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infiltrator Posted August 12, 2011 Share Posted August 12, 2011 Not a single word. What's the first word in the message? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.