Jump to content

DangerAnt

Active Members
  • Content Count

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About DangerAnt

  • Rank
    Hak5 Fan

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. no worries on that front, i have all the toys. Routers, Pineapples, laptops, and hubs (kind of hard to find now). I just need to time to set it all up and test. Thanks again for your input and assistance.
  2. good thinking, i'll test but it will take me some time to set up. Thanks for the suggestions
  3. Thanks for your reply Chrizree. attached is an nmap scan of my public IP showing that all the ports are in fact open. As far as router logs, unfortunately my router doesn't give great logs on this front. and as far as the web interface for C2 i have no intention of allowing the web interface be accessible from the internet, VPN to my network only. but as i said in my last post, i have had no problems with other port forwarding rules (VPN access is the only other thing i forward rules for).
  4. Hi everyone! I'm trying to set up my C2 server so i can plant some devices for a security audit at my employer's network (with permission naturally) I have my C2 server set up at my home. When i connect my Hak5 devices to my home network they communicate without any problems, but when i restart the C2 server using my domain name and update the device configs so they connect to the server using the domain name (or public IP for that matter) i can't seam to get them to connect. My C2 server is using the INTERNAL IP address of 10.0.0.16 (as you can see in the attached image) and
  5. i don't think this is what i'm seeing. when i go to 2.7.0 i can only use the nano for about 10 min max before the cpu spikes to 100% (according to the dashboard) and pages will no longer load and i can't ssh to it. one point that will add is that i had sslsplit mod loaded, but no other mods. either way the 2.6 firmware works perfect for me (aside from sslsplit not working).
  6. I'll go one step further, i think the hole problem with 2.7.0 IS third party modules. Be the change you want to see in the world and pick up some of the "dead" modules.
  7. 2.6.2 appears to be the "best" firmware for my use. P.S. I agree that 2.7.0 appears to be broken or "hosed" if you prefer, but i'm willing to bet that 2.7.1 will be the best yet once they get a chance to work on it.
  8. ok first things first, i think the reason you are seeing more people complain about the tetra than the nano is cost. the tetra costs twice as much as the nanao so people are expecting flawless performance $100 more than the nano. With that being said, check these forums again you will see a good number of people complaining about that Nano. As far as the commend "In fact on the most recent firmware update for the nano people were saying that it was quite good and all the modules were working." i strongly disagree with this. In my humble opinion the latest firmware makes the nano un
  9. I noticed the same thing on my Signal Owl, but not yet on my Nano. My solution (again for the owl) was to boot the device up, and then plug in the USB wireless card. This caused the Owl to assign the internal card as wlan1, and when i plugged in the external card it would get wlan1 Now i have done the same with my Nano just out of habit at this point. I let the device boot up, then plug in my external card and it always get wlan2 (3rd wifi card) that i can then use in client mode without affecting PineAP. Hope you found this helpful. P.S. My Signal Owl has been deemed
  10. same experience here, but i had a lot of problems with 2.7.0. If anyone at the Hak5 team reads this, please consider pulling the 2.7.0 firmware
  11. this could be explained by the Nano not working with 5GHz network. If these devices are using and connecting over 2.4GHz it should be working as advertised.
  12. I'm kind of in the same boat as you, just got my first Pineapple yesterday. what i found is that the latest firmware is a bit buggy. I suggest skipping this latest firmware and use the last one back (2.6.7 if i recall correctly). Don't be hard on Hak5 for this, we have been in the throws of Covid-19 since 2.7.0 was released. I have the utmost faith that they will get problems with 2.7.0 firmware sorted out when they can. P.S. One of the problem i found with 2.7.0 was with sslsplit seaming to cause the cpu to max out and the pineapple to lock up. remember Hak5 did not make sslsplit
  13. Thanks Darren, your support as always is appreciated.
  14. it is, and thats exactly what i needed. thanks for the help!
  15. Just got my first Pineapple Nano. would love to have an opinion of it but it turns out that i can't run it at all due to all the download links on the website being broken. Can anyone provide a working link or fix the existing links? When i click the download link on every firmware i get {"error_message":"firmware verison not found"} https://downloads.hak5.org/pineapple/nano
×
×
  • Create New...