Ron
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Posts posted by Ron
-
-
But thats not how to OP posted their original question. I am sure that if all he wanted was a smartcard dumper program some one would have more than generous. I just dont wash my clothing until it is absoluty necessary, you have no idea how far some febreeze and a bottle of axe can get you :).
Funny your avatar is a box of dingle berries! LOL! when your skivvies have a case of those, febreze and axe
won't get you so far...
-
ok, my perception is that all you people are just not getting it.
of course they have enough to 'kick her to the curb' as to
disciplinary action. what I am understanding is that they want
to be able to access/define/copy what it is specifically as to
a file or what the company secret/s that she passed along.
now, here's what i perceive is the crux of the matter. they
need further 'hard' evidence so as to be able to prosecute
her criminally and/or civilly. i'm guessing this is in canada
where i don't know laws, but here in the u.s., federally or
perhaps in some states, it is a serious crime to take and
pass along what are know as 'trade secrets'. there are
some serious fines and criminal penalties as well. THATS
what i think they are after. not 'just enough' to simply
fire her. they have more than enough for that.
just my 2 coins of small value..
This Can't Be True. Packet Sniffing On Car Ecu's
in Security
Posted · Edited by Ron
Seems there was a case where the gom't 'backdoored' the onstar to listen in to conversations
of the occupants. Problem was, well, aside from possible illegal 'wiretapping' the vehicle safety
systems were compromised, airbags or anti-lock brakes were not up snuff when this wiretapping
took place.
http://news.cnet.com/FBI-taps-cell-phone-m..._3-6140191.html
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=57331