ok, my perception is that all you people are just not getting it.
of course they have enough to 'kick her to the curb' as to
disciplinary action. what I am understanding is that they want
to be able to access/define/copy what it is specifically as to
a file or what the company secret/s that she passed along.
now, here's what i perceive is the crux of the matter. they
need further 'hard' evidence so as to be able to prosecute
her criminally and/or civilly. i'm guessing this is in canada
where i don't know laws, but here in the u.s., federally or
perhaps in some states, it is a serious crime to take and
pass along what are know as 'trade secrets'. there are
some serious fines and criminal penalties as well. THATS
what i think they are after. not 'just enough' to simply
fire her. they have more than enough for that.
just my 2 coins of small value..