VaKo Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 http://arch.kimag.es/share/83529044.jpg[/img] http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ All I can say is "Fuck you, you money grabbing, whore of a cult" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sablefoxx Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 http://arch.kimag.es/share/83529044.jpg[/img] http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ All I can say is "Fuck you, you money grabbing, whore of a cult" Wish i could be there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 you probley are going Sablefoxx your just saying that so you could walk passed all the other "anonymous" people without wearing a mask :shock: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 o...k. I will not ask Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sablefoxx Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 you probley are going Sablefoxx your just saying that so you could walk passed all the other "anonymous" people without wearing a mask :shock: hehe... 8-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 Can any thing 4chan 'says' or 'dose' be trusted? All 4ch... I mean Anonymous needs to do is produce trust worth significant evidence of unlawfully conduct on the organizations part of scientology and they would be shutdown here in the England. They aren't a church, they aren't tax exempted, they are closer to a corporation than any thing else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaKo Posted January 24, 2008 Author Share Posted January 24, 2008 I don't think Anonymous thought it through any further than "lets piss them off", and I don't think it will stick longer than there attention to other memes. When Fox did there Internet Hate Machine hit piece, they promised to do something similar, but Fox is still broadcasting shite as I type. But, Scientology might just play into it and keep pouring fuel on the fire. All in all, there two well matched opponents, who will hopefully expend a lot of resources on what is essentially a fruitless battle. As for Scientology's status as a religion in the UK, our dumb laws on religious tolerance*, hate crimes and political correctness (where saying "your wrong" is considered a legal matter, and not one of debate - see certain elements of Islam) may mean that attacking them in any fashion is likely to get you arrested. I don't care if they want to believe in that crap themselves, but charging money for acceptance and preying on weak people really annoys me. The fact that they setup shop outside the tube bombings really pisses me off. There use of celebrities to draw in other members and rinse them really pisses me off. There use of blatant intimidation and efforts to "destroy" people who disagree pisses me off. Yes, parallels to other religions can be drawn but I don't remember Islamic, Hindu or Christian missionaries attempting to sell salvation to anyone. There business model is closer to heroin dealers than anything else in my mind. I really hope Germany does take the stance of outlawing this dangerous cult. *The irony of religious tolerance is that at the end of the day, a lot of faiths, if not all of them are going to wind up in the "Wrong!" camp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Famicoman Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 We are anonymous, we are legion! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sablefoxx Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 Crazy: http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=pPol_m8wm8Y&NR=1 Of course they will always be wackos, but these wackos have lots of money which makes them extra dangerous I don't think its possible for just Anonymous to stop scientology in its tracks (but i do hope that happens) but hopefully it will get to the point where they give up to some degree and get the fuck out of my tubez. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 Isn't scientology band in a bunch of third world countries? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPShirase Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 What I'm worried 'bout is the new slew of skiddies produced by this. I mean Anon & company practically spoonfed the tools to anyone asking JOIN US! url: http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology tools: http://anonym.to/http://rapidshare.com/files/46645 ... target: 68.178.153.227 protocol: UDP /from Digg's quotes.. what do you guys think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sablefoxx Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 Wheres a botnet when you need one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaKo Posted January 25, 2008 Author Share Posted January 25, 2008 There DDoS was lame, most of the sites that went "down" where behind firewalls that simply dropped traffic from those IP's involved. I spent a good part of last night working my way threw different irc channels talking to people involved, and the lack of technical expertise became rapidly apparent. It would have taken us much longer, but I think that we could have dealt with the attacks had the been directed here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sablefoxx Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 There DDoS was lame, most of the sites that went "down" where behind firewalls that simply dropped traffic from those IP's involved. I spent a good part of last night working my way threw different irc channels talking to people involved, and the lack of technical expertise became rapidly apparent. It would have taken us much longer, but I think that we could have dealt with the attacks had the been directed here. Has anonymous every been anything but kids with access driver and metasploit? I just hope this attracts more talented folks, that can do more damage. Where is stormworm when you need it? And even if thier firewall blocks the IPs it still has to say 'no' so if you have a big enough botnet it is still possible to take down the site (but you need alot more). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPShirase Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 but if it does bring in better talent. will we even hear about it? (if a tree falls in the woods sorta thing?)Â or more accurately, i dropplet in a rainshower? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaKo Posted January 25, 2008 Author Share Posted January 25, 2008 There seems to be word on the wire that last nights actions were part of a distraction tactic and other stuff was going on in the background. Why they didn't call in a few botnets to help is beyond me tbh. Although it could just be a publicity stunt. *chan is akin to multiple terrorist cells sometimes working in tandem, mostly its just chaos though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlowMe Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 I might go for the lulz. But to be honest, I don't give a flying fuck about Scientology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metatron Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 It is what it is, good luck to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tabath Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 It is what it is, good luck to them. Good luck to them or scientology? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonlit Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 It is what it is, good luck to them. Good luck to them or scientology? Both I suppose, they're not the only "religion" to do what they do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPShirase Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 ......well so much for that.. http://711chan.org/ http://www.partyvan.info/ both down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 ......well so much for that.. http://711chan.org/ http://www.partyvan.info/ both down. Partyvan is back up but 711chan is down and out poor hamsters were staved of the wheel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPShirase Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 /i/ is still down and anon is all over the place trying to regroup. 711 had that message from "the regime" or some thing along with a reply to their you tube vid. ah the drama. starting to play out like a skiddie soap opera. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothCriminal Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 There DDoS was lame, most of the sites that went "down" where behind firewalls that simply dropped traffic from those IP's involved. I spent a good part of last night working my way threw different irc channels talking to people involved, and the lack of technical expertise became rapidly apparent. It would have taken us much longer, but I think that we could have dealt with the attacks had the been directed here. @Vako How do DDoS attacks work on sites behind firewalls. Shouldn't a decent firewall block this? My basic understanding of a DDoS attack is flooding the server with requests (such as the ping /t command). Wouldn't a decent firewall block the ping requests? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparda Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 How do DDoS attacks work on sites behind firewalls. Shouldn't a decent firewall block this? My basic understanding of a DDoS attack is flooding the server with requests (such as the ping /t command). Wouldn't a decent firewall block the ping requests? Firewalls can't stop what they don't know what to stop. All you can do is use a distrabuted router packet dropping system to aleviate the presure on the paticulare data center that the server that is under atack is stored in. Basicly, it's near immpossible (unless you control every router on the Internet, and have several servers all over the planet that have the same internet IP address) to stop a DDoS atack that uses a simple flooding mechanisme. Anny whoo, development of the histerical sort: More coal on the fire, more steam in the engin, the faster it's going to crash and burn and become such a spectical. [me=Sparda]cheers for Vako's prediction "Fire + Fire = The internet wins every time"[/me] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.