Jump to content

Using tools over SSH Nano


fearherbs1

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys  is there a way to use the tools on the Nano over ssh? 

When I try to use reaver for example this is the output I get:

root@Pineapple:~# opkg install reaver --dest sd
Package reaver (1.6.3-1) installed in sd is up to date.
root@Pineapple:~# reaver
-ash: reaver: not found
root@Pineapple:~#

 

I also tried to cd to the sd directory and obtained the same result:

root@Pineapple:/sd# opkg install reaver --dest sd
Package reaver (1.6.3-1) installed in sd is up to date.
root@Pineapple:/sd# reaver
-ash: reaver: not found
root@Pineapple:/sd#

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated :). 
 


 

Posted
3 hours ago, fearherbs1 said:

Any help would be greatly appreciated :). 

needs a couple of links

ln -s /sd/usr/bin/reaver /usr/bin/reaver

ln -s /sd/usr/bin/wash /usr/bin/wash

should run after that

Posted
1 hour ago, Just_a_User said:

needs a couple of links


ln -s /sd/usr/bin/reaver /usr/bin/reaver

ln -s /sd/usr/bin/wash /usr/bin/wash

should run after that

Thanks man, the commands work perfectly now. A bit unrelated but when I run airmon-ng the interface list does not look right. Is this normal for the nano?

root@Pineapple:/sd/wifite2# airmon-ng

PHY     Interface       Driver          Chipset

null    802.11bgn       ??????          non-mac80211 device? (report this!)
null    IEEE            ??????          non-mac80211 device? (report this!)
null    Mode:Master     ??????          non-mac80211 device? (report this!)
null    Tx-Power=17     ??????          non-mac80211 device? (report this!)
null    dBm             ??????          non-mac80211 device? (report this!)
phy0    wlan0           ??????          Not pci, usb, or sdio
phy0    wlan0-1         ??????          Not pci, usb, or sdio
phy1    wlan1           ??????          Atheros Communications, Inc. AR9271 802.11n
 

I tried factory resetting and re flashing the nano with the factory firmware and it still looks like this.

Posted
Just now, fearherbs1 said:

Is this normal for the nano?

I was told by @Foxtrot  that this is a grep issue or something and that everything is working correctly. It will be addressed at some point in the future i think.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...