cristianbl Posted February 25, 2015 Posted February 25, 2015 Dear Hak5 Community, Whilst playing around with the Wifi Pineapple MK5 -> dnsspoof and I noticed that whilst I would receive the spoofed reply, dnsmasq would also send the correct record. I then started investigating dnsmasq and I noticed that it is possible to use it in order to spoof hosts directly. The problem I have with dnsspoof is that sometimes the browser would get the correct reply thus making this module less useful. When using dnsmasq the success rate is 100%. Do any of you know why we are not dropping dnsspoof and use dnsmasq instead? I have a proof of concept infusion, but before I work on it any more I would like to know if anyone could foresee any issues with using dnsmasq instead of dnsspoof. Kind regards, Cristian Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.