Guest K1u Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 http://news.google.com/news?q=tom+foley&am...ws&ct=title Now whats your view on this issue, this really i think is well stupid if you think about it the guy passes laws against online predators but now he does it himself, and now he comes out with a bogus story that he was molested at ages 14-15 be a priest wtfh, so i guess he has the right to send dirty emails to 16 year olds?!?!?!?!?!?!? oh and did i mention recently i believe yesterday he also declared hes gay and he wants to get rehab. (yeah i know whats going to happen the courts arent going to do crap there just going to let him be like they have done to so many of these political fucks) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armadaender Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 Appearantly the man was sexually abused as a child but that does not give him the right to speak to a young, male page in such a way (or anyone aside from his wife for that matter). The man shouldn't been able to resign but instead fired, and then sent to trial for sexual misconduct and harrasment. Found quilty and sent to prision for a year where his new "friends" will make a toy out of his ass (child sexoffenders are at the bottom of prison food-chains). Then forced to spend the next five years in rehab, all the while doing community service. Lastly, add his name to the nation sex offender registry. And that's all before the kids family decideds to sue him in civil court for a few cold million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garda Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 I love the Daily show piece that they did on this. Congressmen are allocated tasks according to how ineffective they will be in that area. Foley, the sexual deviant, given the task of protecting children from sexual exploitation. Ted Stevens, an old guy why knows nothing about computers or the internet, who believes the internet is indeed a series of tubes, given the task of regulating it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest K1u Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 Appearantly the man was sexually abused as a child but that does not give him the right to speak to a young, male page in such a way (or anyone aside from his wife for that matter).The man shouldn't been able to resign but instead fired, and then sent to trial for sexual misconduct and harrasment. Found quilty and sent to prision for a year where his new "friends" will make a toy out of his ass (child sexoffenders are at the bottom of prison food-chains). Then forced to spend the next five years in rehab, all the while doing community service. Lastly, add his name to the nation sex offender registry. And that's all before the kids family decideds to sue him in civil court for a few cold million. And this is probbably what everyone wants to happen to him but im sure that nothing will happen to him just like in many other cases of political figures doing illegal and nothing happens to them personnaly i hope the bastard burns in hell... may i recall i believe a political figure dont know the name of him but i belive he went to malysia and abused raped sold kids into prostitution and he comes back and the courts didnt do crap to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armadaender Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 And this is probbably what everyone wants to happen to him but im sure that nothing will happen to him just like in many other cases of political figures doing illegal and nothing happens to them personnaly i hope the bastard burns in hell... may i recall i believe a political figure dont know the name of him but i belive he went to malysia and abused raped sold kids into prostitution and he comes back and the courts didnt do crap to him. American jurisdiction at it's finest. They'll spend hundreds of court hours to lock-up a person charged with pot possession and intent to sell when he only have a few ounces on him but they'll do nothing when young kids are being sexually abused by ceos and senators. Better yet, they''ll do nothing when a ceo, representative or senator does anything illegal. I'm still suprised the Enron execs got time in prison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaKo Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 Have you seen the way republicans are running to defend this guy? http://mediamatters.org/items/200610050008 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/05/limbaugh-blames-pages/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armadaender Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 Rush and Savage are the most fanatical, inane and imprudent individuals who should not have their own shows for the sake of the US, nay the world. Both have their heads jammed so far up their asses that neither of them could tell you what's really going on anywhere in the world because the Bush administration hasn't told them yet. All they do is play stupid when questioned by democrates and throw holy water at them yelling "blasphemy!, repent!", thank the lord for quote: "Level-headed republicans", and kiss Bush's ass. My father sometimes listens to Savage on the radio at work, and it makes me want to hit him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooper Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 Check out The Daily Show for 4 october (it's on Mininova). Fox News actually had the balls to state that Mark Foley was a Democrat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macker Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 16 is the age of consent hear in the UK, what’s it in the US. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaKo Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 The kid was 15 when it kicked off. And besides, what self respecting 50year old thinks kids are fair game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest K1u Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 Heres something interesting i found... http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/9/29/213317/326 One former page tells ABC News that his class was warned about Foley by people involved in the program. The page worked for Rep. Rodney Alexander, R-La., who said Friday that when he learned of the e-mail exchanges 10 to 11 months ago, he called the teen's parents. Alexander told the Ruston Daily Leader, "We also notified the House leadership that there might be a potential problem," a reference to the House's Republican leaders. Another thing i need to point out is that Foley passed a law in 1994 making sexual predators be instituted into mental hospital for there actions. Now think about it the same guy who passes this law is now making excuses why he should not get in trouble and heh guess what hes probabbly not going to get in trouble the media will be on this case for a couple more weeks then everyone will forget about it and foley will be free to roam thats good ol american justice for ya!... well on a lighter side this is what foley should do kill himself no seriously i think thats the best route for him btw: Do you guys believe he will ever get back into politics, will he be allowed :?: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeoneE1se Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 16 is the age of consent hear in the UK, what’s it in the US. it varies state to state a lot have the age at 16 most at 18 and a few at 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest K1u Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 16 is the age of consent hear in the UK, what’s it in the US. it varies state to state a lot have the age at 16 most at 18 and a few at 14 Ages- http://www.actwin.com/eatonohio/gay/consent.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoyBoy Posted October 8, 2006 Share Posted October 8, 2006 What a bitch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
take it take Posted October 8, 2006 Share Posted October 8, 2006 Fox News actually had the balls to state that Mark Foley was a Democrat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt {Undead} Posted October 8, 2006 Share Posted October 8, 2006 Appearantly the man was sexually abused as a child but that does not give him the right to speak to a young, male page in such a way (or anyone aside from his wife for that matter). The man shouldn't been able to resign but instead fired, and then sent to trial for sexual misconduct and harrasment. Found quilty and sent to prision for a year where his new "friends" will make a toy out of his ass (child sexoffenders are at the bottom of prison food-chains). Then forced to spend the next five years in rehab, all the while doing community service. Lastly, add his name to the nation sex offender registry. And that's all before the kids family decideds to sue him in civil court for a few cold million. Quite literally owned irl :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gameman733 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 I personally highly doubt anything criminal will happen to him. This is just another case of "your in a position of authority, you can go free." As far as what should happen, its been summed up. Take his behind to jail, and let him sit there a few years. THEN he can get help if he thinks he still needs it. As far as the Fox-Democrat/Republican thing, this is just another reason why I think political partys are stupid. Side note: has anyone seen the chat logs? someone told me the url (which i wil not post here, use google). they are VERY disturbing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaKo Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 I'd just post them with a NSFW/M tag, censorship is not needed in this case. <incidently, moved to news> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest K1u Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Side note: has anyone seen the chat logs? someone told me the url (which i wil not post here, use google). they are VERY disturbing. Actually abc news couldnt show the chat logs due to them being extremly graphic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leetabix Posted October 12, 2006 Share Posted October 12, 2006 Fox News are very well known in my line of work for being a joke as a sorce of reliable media. I think this is something else that gives weight to this opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooper Posted October 12, 2006 Share Posted October 12, 2006 Let me just say that if you look the guy up in Wikipedia and then click on to the special page on the scandal, you'll be able to read some of those exchanges. The guy's clearly a sick fuck. And I don't care if he was drunk, molested as a child and didn't get enough hugs from his mommy as he was growing up. It makes no difference. He's gonna go to jail and get his asshole blown out by some inmates. And you know what? He totally deserves it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.