Charles Posted January 15, 2010 Posted January 15, 2010 Worded the title really badly, but what I am looking for are opinions on what would be a good distro to learn the "basics" of linux. I know Ubuntu fairly well, but I want to get some experience with other distros. I was thinking about messing around with Fedora, but I'm not sure what is being used on an enterprise/small business level. (RHEL?) Thanks. Quote
VaKo Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 CentOS is a clone of RHEL, and is basically RHEL sans support. For enterprise use you should also look at Solaris, FreeBSD and Windows though.. Quote
Charles Posted January 16, 2010 Author Posted January 16, 2010 Thanks VaKo. I'll probably install those in VMs and mess around with the basics. Quote
RogueSpear Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 For better or worse, a huge amount of enterprises use RHEL or CentOS. I am personally just beginning to find out just how incredible FreeBSD is (and am kicking myself in the ass for wasting so many years on Windows). Time is limited, but you really do need to diversify. At least have a basic knowledge Linux/BSD which probably equates to CentOS and FreeBSD. As the years go on I'm finding it more and more difficult to keep up on everything. It's getting to be like medicine where you need to specialize, yet everyone expects you to know everything. Quote
wh1t3 and n3rdy Posted January 30, 2010 Posted January 30, 2010 We predominantly use Solaris and windows Quote
Charles Posted January 31, 2010 Author Posted January 31, 2010 Thanks for the info. I think 99% of the machines at work are running Win NT/2000/2K3/XP. I think the only linux box is the NAS, but I think that's because all the "IT staff" know is windows. Heh. Quote
VaKo Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 Not really a heh moment. Microsoft have spent years working on Enterprise level products that can create an environment which is highly manageable, easy to control, completely integrated and have terrabytes of documentation to back this all up with. Linux, and especially the FOSS end of the market doesn't have anything you can compare in scope and design to active directory. Quote
Charles Posted February 5, 2010 Author Posted February 5, 2010 Totally agreed. While Linux does have it's merits, it is no where close to where AD is as far as ease of management goes. I think that they can use Samba to do LDAP (I think?) but it's no where near as sophisticated as Windows AD. Quote
3w`Sparky Posted March 2, 2010 Posted March 2, 2010 just learn unix this will give you the skills you need for solaris and linux disto's alike except for the way they each handle package management differently but otherwise it's all much of a muchness Quote
VaKo Posted March 4, 2010 Posted March 4, 2010 Agreed, this is why I push FreeBSD, its near as damnit Unix, but not as different as Solaris. Quote
Charles Posted March 4, 2010 Author Posted March 4, 2010 Thanks guys! I think I shall need to install FreeBSD into a VM (after reading the manual ofc) Quote
Tarbizkit Posted March 6, 2010 Posted March 6, 2010 Not really a heh moment. Microsoft have spent years working on Enterprise level products that can create an environment which is highly manageable, easy to control, completely integrated and have terrabytes of documentation to back this all up with. Linux, and especially the FOSS end of the market doesn't have anything you can compare in scope and design to active directory. hmmmm.... you might want to look into novell's product line. suse, oes, e-directory, and zenworks. these products are really good. I have been using edir since it was named nds and this was way before active directory was around. We currently run both directories at my office, mainly due to the fact that even though i feel that some of novell's products are better than ms, none of us can escape the fact that we live in a ms world. With ms having so much of the market share in the enterprise, it tends to push software vendors to make ms only compatible software. Quote
VaKo Posted March 6, 2010 Posted March 6, 2010 I was never a fan of E-Directory compared to MS AD tbh, it always seemed very clunky when I used it. Quote
Charles Posted March 6, 2010 Author Posted March 6, 2010 I think I need to definitely read up on FreeBSD. I downloaded the install DVD and tried to install it in a VM and sat there dumbfounded as to how to work it. *headdesk* Quote
VaKo Posted March 6, 2010 Posted March 6, 2010 If you look at some of the early posts I made on this forum, that was pretty much my reaction. But honestly, spend some time with it and it will make sense. Quote
Charles Posted March 6, 2010 Author Posted March 6, 2010 I kinda figured as much. Thanks VaKo. Maybe I'll have time to tinker with it after I finish my 4 month cert spree. Quote
George Walker Posted April 10, 2010 Posted April 10, 2010 Thanks for sharing valuable information Quote
Jokke Posted June 24, 2010 Posted June 24, 2010 RedHat Enterprise Linux, Suse Enterprise Linux, Debian, Solaris, AIX and HP-UX with those you get pretty far. Those are most commonly supported in support contracts and enterprise hardware. Quote
fsck Posted June 24, 2010 Posted June 24, 2010 I think I need to definitely read up on FreeBSD. I downloaded the install DVD and tried to install it in a VM and sat there dumbfounded as to how to work it. *headdesk* If you plan on learning FreeBSD, I recommend you take a look at the FreeBSD Handbook. The handbook is an excellent resource for all things FreeBSD. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.