Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Alright, a friend just asked me if I think it is a good idea for him to convert his current Windows XP 32 bit Gaming PC to a Linux Gaming PC. In my opinion a terrible move but I figured I would expand the question base to include you guys. Any and all comments welcome.

System Specs:

AMD Phenom 9750 (2.5 Quad)

4 GB DDR2 800

Nvidia 280GTX w/ 768mb GDDR3

All the relevant sys specs (I think)

Posted

Linux can only run games that run on OpenGL which isn't very many, and even then you'll have computability issues because WINE isn't perfect.

Posted

Well he does have a powerful system,

I wouldn't plan on gaming much in Linux.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

^^ Agreed.. if your main thing with PC is gaming then stick with Windows... if you want to dabble with *nix then you would be better off running Linux from a virtual machine within Windows,.. that setup is powerful enough for sure !!

Posted

Linux isn't a serious gaming platform to be brutally honest, it has games but they tend to feature badly animated penguins or are clones of the games you loved 2 years ago. You can run some windows games under WINE and occasionally they get ported to linux but not often. If you are a gamer then install Vista x64 for your games (with 2GB+ RAM, Vista x64 is faster than XP, I have 6GB and I get 10FPS+ in BF2 under Vista), and either dual boot Ubuntu or obtain a copy of VMware Workstation. Vista is just better for games and audio, while linux naturally lends itself to tasks such as servers, appliances, data processing and development.

Posted

GAMING ON PC = WINDOWS

as for the VMware idea earlier. running a game on a VM is a terrible idea. You don't get the benefits of the awesome video card that guy has. Becuase VM emulates a fairly basic card.

Run linux in a VM, but they you lose all the cool stuff you can do with ur hardware, because ur not accessing ur hardware. ur accessing VMware hardware....but by all means load up a free copy of server and play with Linux. it'll never pick up market share if ppl don't use it.

Posted

no, dont use vmware for linux gaming, use Virtualbox, because with the new v-box guest extensions, you get alot more acceleration out of the vm.

hell i cant even do any desktop effects with vmware...

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

ut2k4 and quake 4 run better in linux than in windows. DEFCON also looks awesome in *nix. Don't expect to play too many games in linux though, unless you subscribe to cedega.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Maybe it is time to look at the WINE, and create a additional layer (which will allow same access as Windows) for Windows Games under Linux.

hell, maybe for wine they should just go ahead and set it up where you put in a legit copy of windows, it rips everything but the gui and extra programs (ie. notepad/etc) and just boots with that for a compatibility layer when using WINE. That way it *is* emulation, BUT only to emulate the Compatibility layer.

Posted
hell, maybe for wine they should just go ahead and set it up where you put in a legit copy of windows, it rips everything but the gui and extra programs (ie. notepad/etc) and just boots with that for a compatibility layer when using WINE. That way it *is* emulation, BUT only to emulate the Compatibility layer.

True, i hate to use WINE, if i ever need to run windows app on a Linux machine, VirtualBox is my best bet...

Posted
Linux isn't a serious gaming platform to be brutally honest, it has games but they tend to feature badly animated penguins or are clones of the games you loved 2 years ago. You can run some windows games under WINE and occasionally they get ported to linux but not often. If you are a gamer then install Vista x64 for your games (with 2GB+ RAM, Vista x64 is faster than XP, I have 6GB and I get 10FPS+ in BF2 under Vista), and either dual boot Ubuntu or obtain a copy of VMware Workstation. Vista is just better for games and audio, while linux naturally lends itself to tasks such as servers, appliances, data processing and development.

I disagree on Vista, even in the 64 bit mode. I choose to run XP 64 bit. It's leaner and for gaming screams on my system. I also seem to get better results with older games as well like Unreal or COD 2. As well as awesome response from newer games...like the ever buggy COD WaW.....

Posted

The closest you get to a Linux gaming pc is to install cedega (maybe also point2play)

wine is more for programs not games.. so dont wine it :D

anyways i would stay on xp for gaming :)

Posted

I agree you must run Linux as a vm if gaming is your basic need .A dual boot is also a considerably good option.....And Refering to the Xp Vista thing Xp is much better at everything(Gaming+Daily Use)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...