Jump to content

RazerBlade

Active Members
  • Posts

    216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by RazerBlade

  1. On 2018-03-20 at 12:23 PM, athman8 said:

    The only thing that I can think of is that why should the Deep Web be legalized in the first place? I mean, when we talk about the deep web, it is somewhat similar to the possibility of surfing in total anonymity. This aspect makes it wholly desirable for cyber criminals.

    And?

    • Like 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Broti said:

    Sorry, but I beg to differ. They cover different areas of attack style, except a certain amount of similarities. Darren made a post in the topic Ducky VS Bunny which nails it imho.

     

    Fair enough. But I still stand by it that the Bunny is overall much more effective than the ducky. Sure, the ducky may be fast but if you are getting into these kinds of attack, the best tool is the BashBunny in my opinion.

  3. 10 hours ago, Kayjay said:

    Hi all,

    Newbie here!  I'm teaching myself how to analyze and hack my own network.  I have worked with Wireshark and Charles debugging proxy - very little!

    I'm interested in purchasing some Hak5 products and thought I would ask the community, which ones to start with.  My initial goals are to monitor traffic and extract passwords.  

    Between Opendns, Wireshark and Charles, I have a good idea regarding the sites being visited on my network and would like to take this further.  So far, I'm looking at the Wifi Pineapple and Bash Bunny.  

    Thanks!

    If you wanna go for the pineapple, go for the TETRA cause Nano sucks. For USB, BashBunny all the way. 100x better than the ducky, it can do so much more stuff.

    If you really want the ducky, I would recommend the malduino. It's the same as the rubberducky but much cheaper. All payload are compatible with the ducky.

    Link here: https://malduino.com/

  4. So I have a question. How do I reverse enginer a Javascript file? The problem comes from my previous thread: 

    The goal is to get the request headers the website has so I can scrape data from the website. The problem is that the website uses a javasricpt to download the request headers and can therefore not be seen in chrome. In the script that the website uses, headers.js does someother mean things. It replaces the http connection with a websocket one:

    getURL().replace(/^http/,"ws")

    So I want to run the javascript file so I can print out the final url that it creates complete with headers. Right now they don't show up.

    Maybe a way would be to directly interact with the website, maybe the chrome console?

    Link to JS if anyone would able to help: https://www.avanza.se/jmvc/production/241897.18/header/header.js

  5. I saw Darrens video yesterday and thought how his improvements that could be made to the BashBunny. Sometimes, windows defender removes malicious files and therefore it could be smart to use read only storage.  But I He said that you could read only storage and exfiltrate the files via network. But I would like to see an improvement made to the bash bunny, to have an read and write exfil partition on the bunny. So one partition where all the payloads and stuff like that are read only but it will also have an partition to exfiltrate small files without the need of network.

    Ping: @Darren Kitchen

  6. Well it's quite a lot of data I want to download so doing it manually won't happen. I have been looking at this: https://github.com/aaugustin/websockets But haven't got it to work as I want it. This could maybe work: https://github.com/novnc/websockify but I don't really understand how to use it. 

    Also, with chrome you can copy the cURL address with all variables. Maybe I could get it to connect that way?

×
×
  • Create New...