Jump to content

dukestraykker

Active Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

dukestraykker's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I dont believe it has any sort of function to do that at all not even overall. What somebody mentioned to me was that perhaps I could set everything to be behind the AP, have that assign dhcp to everything and then only control b/w on the devices required, and have everything on the .2.x "subnet". That would mean everything can see everything again, and all devices would just go out the pre-existing routes from the AP to the modem/router that work already with the phone and 1 pc?
  2. Hi all. Thank you for the replies. I think to answer a few of the questions to hopefully make it more clear why i would like what I am trying to do: The wireless AP is an Accton MR3201A. It currently is set up on 192.168.2.1 and the WAN side is set to 192.168.1.50 to access the modem/internet. The reason I would like it set up like this is to restrict the 1 pc and the phone connected to the Accton MR3201A with the quota system and bandwidth limiting features of the gargoyle firmware. I believe it can currently route from the .2.x network to the .1.x network as the AP itself can host my phone, and via a wifi app it controls the pc on .1.66 for vlc media player as a remote control. I do not think I *need* it to be on seperate subnets, in the normal sense. I am just looking for a way to make the 2 items on the Accton MR3201A .2.x AP communicate with the devices on the regular modem and vice versa. If this means they are on the same subnet then that is fine. Currently the netcomm router/modem is handling dhcp for the .1.x range and the Accton MR3201A is handling the dhcp for .2.x range. Perhaps I mislabelled the hub. It is a direct passthrough device, switch/hub? Its only purpose is to add extra ports to connect all the wired devices to the network :) The adsl modem is fully under my control no ISP configurations as it is an aftermarket item as well.
  3. Oh nevermind I cant edit the post.. I have attached them to this post below :)
  4. I believe it does yes. I have attached some more screenshots to my initial post from both the gargoyle wifi access point and the router itself.
  5. First of all hello all. I have been reading around here for a few weeks and have given a few suggestions a try and it has been great fun. This past week or so I have been trying in vain to set up my home network a little differently. To stop all my own confusion I have made a network diagram. My router is a netcomm NB6plus4Wn. My WAP is running gargoyle software. What I would like to do is allow the pc and phone on the .2.x access to the .1.x subnet, and vice versa. I have a media server running on the pc on .2.72 and the playstation on .1.80 would like to access that as well as a few other various cross network file sharing. Can anyone help me get my directions clear please?
  6. I have read the thread and I am still a little confused unfortunately :( I have made a network diagram. My router is a netcomm NB6plus4Wn. My WAP is running gargoyle software. What I would like to do is allow the pc and phone access to the .1.x subnet, and vice versa. I have a media server running on the pc on .2.72 and the playstation on .1.80 would like to access that as well as a few other various cross network file sharing. Can anyone help me get my directions clear please?
×
×
  • Create New...