Jump to content

pyr

Active Members
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pyr

  1. pyr

    Wpa Psk Hastables

    Ok. I just want to get the more rainbow tables I can to be able to crack WPAs when I travel. For example when I found a WPA on a linksys SSID, I can crack it only if I have the hastable "linksys". So I just ask where I can get the offensive-security tables.. but it does not seem to be easy..
  2. pyr

    Wpa Psk Hastables

    Thanks. How does this website work ? He has also downloaded wpa hastables and test every SSIDs ?
  3. pyr

    Wpa Psk Hastables

    Hi all, I need a clearer vision ; what I've found by searching wpa(2)-psk hashtable are : - churchwifi 7 Gb set, - churchwifi 33 Gb set - and ~330 Gb (165 files*2gb) at http://www.offensive-security.com/wpa-tables/ Questions : Is the 7Gb set useless when I have the 33 Gb set ? There are no seeders for the offensive-security torrents : do you know where I can download them somethere ? Or paid ?.. Thanks.
  4. pyr

    Payload Advice

    It is. Which language do you want to use ? I advice you native C/C++. If you want something silent (I guess), don't forget to check for read-only usb storage, and disk free space, to avoid annoying messages. edit : you will not be able to write your payload in the cd-rom emulated part of the usb drive. If you think about writing your payload for automatic lauching with U3, it is not possible, because U3 autorun is located on the read-only part. You also will not be able to edit the autorun.inf, for the same reason.
  5. Hi, So I have made a C++ code that silently call my exe. This way is much faster ! I launch 7 executables : Average execution time : 2,5 sec. Standard deviation : 0,4 sec. My algo-code : - Autorun U3 lanch my .exe (cpp) - 7-unzip an archive in %temp% (zipped with "stored mode" only, no compression, it's faster to store then unzip than compress then uncompress...) - lauch my executables just unzipped, but don't wait for their each end, it means that I can launch several action in parallel, I think it's faster. - each exe logs into a text file - the last exe sends an email with log in attachment, - in case of non-internet access, copy the log on the usb key, - each action are totally silent, - lauch explorer.exe like a fake action, pretend that the usb key is not *too* suspect ;) - delete created exe in %temp% I don't know what to do more now. Still few compatibily problems XP/Vista/Seven. I don't think I can be faster. If you have any ideas ?
  6. Did you try to delete le u3 part ? Fomat low level ?
  7. Thank you for your answer. I know how to use this command, but my question was : Why do you prefer to copy + execute an exe in %temp% folder , and not just executing the exe directly from the usb ? I mean, is there a raison to loose time in copying instead of directly executing ? Or maybe when you execute from C: drive it's faster than from an usb ? Thank you ps: I also posted this question, among other, here http://forums.hak5.org/index.php?showtopic=15765 but no answer.
  8. Why do you execute the exe file on %temp% and not on the usb key ?
  9. Working link : http://flashboot.ru/index.php?name=Files&a...ile&lid=409
  10. Hi, I checked several usb switchblades, and I have few questions regarding the difference between dealing on the usb key or on a hard drive. I began creating a batch file that call few executables (firefox/ie passwd stealer) located on my usb key. I noticed that it was a bit slow. Than I tested the "7zBlade" package, it consists of unzipping executable to %temp% folder then calling them. I noticed that it was a bit faster. So my questions are : 1) Is it really faster to unzip + execute executables on hard disk VS an usb key ? 2) The "7zBlade" package creator says that he choose to zip his executables because a password protected archive is not checked by antivirus. But during the uncompressing process, the AV can check and block them... So, is it very necessary to loose time in unziping ? 3) I also create a C program that silently call executables : I tried to fast the process. But I do not really see a big difference with a batch file. 4) For Antivirus, what do you think of binding (join) each executable in one. Gain of time ? 5) Up to you, which is the fatest way to execute 3-4 executables ? Execute them on the usb ? on the hard disk ? Batch VS c/c++ : do you think it can be faster because of compiler/interpreter ? Thank you :)
  11. OK thank you ! I will try it. I just followed hak5 articles but they seem to be too old !
  12. Let's see it... The command "tskill" does not exist anymore on Vista/7. Up to now I don't have this command on my Vista nor 7. Assuming "taskkill" command on XP+Vista+7. Let's see your file on my XP SP3, with Avast & Antivir Avira & Norton : - Avira detects it as "virus batch" and delete it.. - Avast too, as trojan - Nothing for norton. IT DOES NOT WORK AT ALL (see log : http://pastebin.com/f3eb3c9cd ) "Access is denied." Antivirus's still up ;) They run in kernelland, so your lazy batch can't shoot them.. Moreover, you don't even RTFM, you should have used : taskkill /F (force to terminate the process) and /IM for imagename (processus name) The same for the firewall, the good command is : netsh firewall set opmode mode = disable >nul AVkillers in userland NEVER work and will NEVER work.
  13. Hi, I want to create my launchpad on my usb micro cruzer sandisk. I downloaded U3_San_Disk.rar from http://www.hak5.org/packages/files/U3_San_Disk.rar But, when I start LPInstaller.exe, it tells me that my usb key is not compatible with U3. (I have the U3 logo on it). In order to verify, I downloaded the "SanDisk official launchpad" on their website, it installed itself very well. So my usb key is definitively U3 compatible. Why does the exe from the hak5 sandisk package does not work ? Exactly the same problem with the U3_San_Disk_Launchpad.rar. Moreover, the Universal_Customizer from hak5 packages does not work too, it tells me "Failed to access your U3 smart drive. U3 Customizer will now shut down" ! Do you know why ? How to fix it ? Thank you :)
×
×
  • Create New...