Jump to content

CrashOverride

Active Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CrashOverride

  1. yeah lets determine wat is going to happen in these couple of days Maybe there is somekind of a structure in here Alltought the arrest stay vage and weard Because every body in the world can buy movies and keep them but u cant do anything with it. Dude if you put a nice big fatt fish in front of somebody's head eventually he will bite. So iam quete interesting what kinda news they can give us, then in will see what the weekend had brings us
  2. idd so basicly you could trow them infront of a judge for this
  3. Wasnt it like they coult only ask mony for support We maintain this free software definition to show clearly what must be true about a particular software program for it to be considered free software. From time to time we revise this definition to clarify it. If you would like to review the changes we've made, please see the History section below for more information. Free software is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of free as in free speech, not as in free beer. Free software is a matter of the users' freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. More precisely, it refers to four kinds of freedom, for the users of the software: The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0). The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this. The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2). The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and modified versions in general) to the public, so that the whole community benefits (freedom 3). Access to the source code is a precondition for this. A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms. Thus, you should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission. You should also have the freedom to make modifications and use them privately in your own work or play, without even mentioning that they exist. If you do publish your changes, you should not be required to notify anyone in particular, or in any particular way. The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person or organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of overall job and purpose, without being required to communicate about it with the developer or any other specific entity. In this freedom, it is the user's purpose that matters, not the developer's purpose; you as a user are free to run a program for your purposes, and if you distribute it to someone else, she is then free to run it for her purposes, but you are not entitled to impose your purposes on her. The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable forms of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and unmodified versions. (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary for conveniently installable free operating systems.) It is ok if there is no way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program (since some languages don't support that feature), but you must have the freedom to redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to make them. In order for the freedoms to make changes, and to publish improved versions, to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary condition for free software. One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free subroutines and modules. If the program's license says that you cannot merge in a suitably-licensed existing module, such as if it requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add, then the license is too restrictive to qualify as free. In order for these freedoms to be real, they must be irrevocable as long as you do nothing wrong; if the developer of the software has the power to revoke the license, or retroactively change its terms, without your doing anything wrong to give cause, the software is not free. However, certain kinds of rules about the manner of distributing free software are acceptable, when they don't conflict with the central freedoms. For example, copyleft (very simply stated) is the rule that when redistributing the program, you cannot add restrictions to deny other people the central freedoms. This rule does not conflict with the central freedoms; rather it protects them. Free software does not mean non-commercial. A free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to sell copies. Whether a change constitutes an improvement is a subjective matter. If your modifications are limited, in substance, to changes that someone else considers an improvement, that is not freedom. However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that if you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in that way also can be acceptable too, on the same condition. (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version at all.) Rules that require release of source code to the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It is also acceptable for the license to require that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one, or that you identify yourself on your modifications. In the GNU project, we use copyleft to protect these freedoms legally for everyone. But non-copylefted free software also exists. We believe there are important reasons why it is better to use copyleft, but if your program is non-copylefted free software, it is still basically ethical. See Categories of Free Software for a description of how free software, copylefted software and other categories of software relate to each other. Sometimes government export control regulations and trade sanctions can constrain your freedom to distribute copies of programs internationally. Software developers do not have the power to eliminate or override these restrictions, but what they can and must do is refuse to impose them as conditions of use of the program. In this way, the restrictions will not affect activities and people outside the jurisdictions of these governments. Thus, free software licenses must not require obedience to any export regulations as a condition of any of the essential freedoms. Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits on what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright. If a copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it is unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated (though this does happen occasionally). However, some free software licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger range of possible restrictions. That means there are many possible ways such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and non-free. We can't possibly list all the ways that might happen. If a contract-based license restricts the user in an unusual way that copyright-based licenses cannot, and which isn't mentioned here as legitimate, we will have to think about it, and we will probably conclude it is non-free. When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like give away or for free, because those terms imply that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as piracy embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See Confusing Words and Phrases that are Worth Avoiding for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of translations of free software into various languages. Finally, note that criteria such as those stated in this free software definition require careful thought for their interpretation. To decide whether a specific software license qualifies as a free software license, we judge it based on these criteria to determine whether it fits their spirit as well as the precise words. If a license includes unconscionable restrictions, we reject it, even if we did not anticipate the issue in these criteria. Sometimes a license requirement raises an issue that calls for extensive thought, including discussions with a lawyer, before we can decide if the requirement is acceptable. When we reach a conclusion about a new issue, we often update these criteria to make it easier to see why certain licenses do or don't qualify. If you are interested in whether a specific license qualifies as a free software license, see our list of licenses. If the license you are concerned with is not listed there, you can ask us about it by sending us email at <licensing@gnu.org>. If you are contemplating writing a new license, please contact the FSF by writing to that address. The proliferation of different free software licenses means increased work for users in understanding the licenses; we may be able to help you find an existing Free Software license that meets your needs. If that isn't possible, if you really need a new license, with our help you can ensure that the license really is a Free Software license and avoid various practical problems. Beyond Software Software manuals must be free, for the same reasons that software must be free, and because the manuals are in effect part of the software. The same arguments also make sense for other kinds of works of practical use — that is to say, works that embody useful knowledge, such as educational works and reference works. Wikipedia is the best known example. Any kind of work can be free, and the definition of free software has been extended to a definition of free cultural works applicable to any kind of works. Open Source? Another group has started using the term open source to mean something close (but not identical) to free software. We prefer the term free software because, once you have heard that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom. The word open never refers to freedom. History From time to time we revise this Free Software Definition to clarify it. Here we provide a list of those modifications, along with links to illustrate exactly what changed, so that others can review them if they like. Version 1.77: Clarify that all retroactive changes to the license are unacceptable, even if it's not described as a complete replacement. Version 1.74: Four clarifications of points not explicit enough, or stated in some places but not reflected everywhere: "Improvements" does not mean the license can substantively limit what kinds of modified versions you can release. Freedom 3 includes distributing modified versions, not just changes. The right to merge in existing modules refers to those that are suitably licensed. Explicitly state the conclusion of the point about export controls. Imposing a license change constitutes revoking the old license. Version 1.57: Add "Beyond Software" section. Version 1.46: Clarify whose purpose is significant in the freedom to run the program for any purpose. Version 1.41: Clarify wording about contract-based licenses. Version 1.40: Explain that a free license must allow to you use other available free software to create your modifications. Version 1.39: Note that it is acceptable for a license to require you to provide source for versions of the software you put into public use. Version 1.31: Note that it is acceptable for a license to require you to identify yourself as the author of modifications. Other minor clarifications throughout the text. Version 1.23: Address potential problems related to contract-based licenses. Version 1.16: Explain why distribution of binaries is important. Version 1.11: Note that a free license may require you to send a copy of versions you distribute to the author. There are gaps in the version numbers because there are many other changes that do not affect the substance of the definition at all. Instead, they fix links, add translations, and so on. If you would like to review the complete list of changes, you can do so on our cvsweb interface. hmmm interesting BTW time like apps are fully hackble u guys know that right but i had 30 days to unstalled it after one week so didnt need the 30
  4. Dude its ok I dont want to know that iam right wrong I want people to know As well as for my self i do sometimes make the most stupid mistakes and then i do the exact same thing as you, enlight my mistake to the victime i made. and after that we grap a beer and instad og making a victem converting him self to an enemy we grap a beer And make new friends trough our journy of life. Wow dude dit write that............................... dude??
  5. DIGIP i did what you said for those who need it like TPB 1000 dollars remember Its not that Iam on my self, I help ollot of people allot of friends of mine don't have the kind of mony/life as I have wich sometimes is hard, you know. But I help them if they need anything from mony to solving an other problem I am there for them you know. and ones again don't understand the millionair thing wrong like disrespect full to people who are not in the same position were i am. Thats totally not were I am iaming att. I mean why should i do that. + i did misouri state university: Compuer sience if that btw forfills your question Kind regards CrashOverride
  6. http://www.streams.xfm.nl/webradio.php?player=0 Here is our radio station Its Dutch so dont care about the smaal comercials comming in
  7. i dont care he/she did a fine job and he or she is skilled its a realy good software
  8. yeah sry for the spelling but i dont care of the mistakes i make in forums, It happens you type to fast and you make mistakes and then the nerds come and try to correct wich is nice and fancy but you need to see there faces when you put there noses in there own mistakes. And yes in a matter of fact i did purchased that movie cus heey iam probably the only milionair from this whole site stfu and think before you ack't get to the point and dont be noobs scriptkiddy's. why is it so that alwhay thos noobs who have a rank below there avatar think they are so cool and great,,, dude get layt, try and get a girlfriend man do something with your life. Its so easy to disturd somebody else meanwhile your the one who is in finacial or social trouble I mean iam sitting here in the hottop writing this becuase i have nothing else todo today. You on the other hand need to work and stuff like that wich i respect (had to do it to) when i was f 15. iam 21 and iam milionair living in The Netherlands and have everything i whant. I respect those who respect others and you will never see me talking about typing mistakes (unless it involved programming). I was trying to be nice here talking about serious things, till those 14 year old nerd's were comming up, tab't over from hackt porno site to this topic. OW yeah and dont ask me questions about things you can find on google Kind regards CrashOverride
  9. For those who are just starting some programmer did a verry nice job by making a kind of introuction to linux for novice hackers First you can feel free to explore Its Windows on a Linux OS http://www.linux-xp.com/ Download it make it bootble and try it I did it and its so much fun But i must say that personally the more advanced is for me as hacker/programmer better
  10. I hate those next gen games I meab they look verry good but the gameplay sucks I miss CS1,6 Quake3 arena red alert 2 BlackHawkDown its all so casuall you dont need to train any more + in these new game you have to shoot like 2 mag's empty untill someone die aka a halo or a battlefied The only game i like next then in GOW and UT3 For the rest its all crap!!!! iam going back play some CS and if i see one FUCKING cheater iam going to track him down and bust his computer
  11. Hackerss grap your books and your knowlage again!!!! We have got a job todó
  12. Congretelations RIAA you are now PHE (Public Hacker Enemy number) "one" int RIAA = "bullshit"; every hacker is going to fund TPB with goverment mony, don't you guys learnd anything back in 1995, didn't you learn'd from the manifesto.? You.. All of you vermins countering the dirt,.. Thinking what..? That you might escape the incomming fire..?/ You'r world shel burn untill it's surface is like glass. PS i gabe TPB 1000 dollars allready Hope u guys do something for them to, doesnt have to be mony involving Off course
  13. Pritty stupid of them dont u think!!!!!! + we use our own made firewall so wtf Thos -s-w whont even get close!!! But its a nice toppic let make a fake port so they are thinking the got something and are fucking around for hours-- so that after there brain comes to the reyelasation that they are getting fould with
  14. Hi iam num 10,000. When piratebay started i was 24,7 gamer and a scriptkiddy. I dont have mutch with piratbay it self but they started there website and donwload possibility's for us. Now as you probably already know,Four men who run one of the most popular file-sharing sites in the world have. been charged with conspiracy to break copyright law in Sweden. Now they will be going on with the site cus they are going to be free by next friday. However they have to pay like 2 mill . My question is how can we help these guys? i mean they are kind of hackers to by making us able to download in a easy and quik way. Ow it would be nice to put this as an announce in your program to (potential idea!) Kind regards From The Netherlands.
×
×
  • Create New...