Jump to content

pr0metheus

Active Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Recent Profile Visitors

772 profile views

pr0metheus's Achievements

  1. wooh! finally fixed it. for those who may be interested in doing likewise, the process is as follows: flash the latest beta firmware version 3.0.0, open /etc/opkg.conf and append the following lines: src/gz snapshots http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/packages src/gz base http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/base/ src/gz luci https://downloads.openwrt.org/chaos_calmer/15.05.1/ar71xx/generic/packages/luci/ src/gz management https://downloads.openwrt.org/chaos_calmer/15.05.1/ar71xx/generic/packages/management/ src/gz packages https://downloads.openwrt.org/chaos_calmer/15.05.1/ar71xx/generic/packages/packages/ then execute the following: opkg update opkg install luci this also installs uhttpd. by default, it binds HTTP to port 80 which i believe will conflict with nginx. to modify, edit /etc/config/uhttpd and modify like so. # HTTP listen addresses, multiple allowed list listen_http 0.0.0.0:1234 then it's a matter of enabling the uhttpd startup and service with /etc/init.d/uhttpd enable /etc/init.d/uhttpd start you will then be able to login to the luci admin page, in the above example, at 172.16.42.1:1234
  2. hi all, so about 2 years ago i decided to turn my mk5 into a plain ole regular openwrt router. though it may seem like sacrelege to amany amongst you, i thought it was pretty dope. i retained many of the pineapple infusions in the background using nginx but used uhttpd for the webadmin. installing it was as simple as: opkg update && opkg install luci /etc/init.d/uhttpd enable /etc/init.d/uhttpd start anyway, that was about two years ago. as one of the antennas broke, it just sat in a box collecting dust since then. however, this week, after finally fixing the damn thing, i decided to reflash and start from scratch. but alias! the luci webserver is broken. no more luci interface: i just keep getting this: Unable to launch the requested CGI program: /www/cgi-bin/luci: No such file or directory anyone familiar with this? i have quite literally been alternating firmware versions — from the latest, down, then from the earliest up. i must've tried in excess of 10 firmware installs by now. then, when i tracked down the date of the build to mid-2014, i fanned out from there... nothing. i just know that the solution is as simple as a few lines of code — any takers? jah bless
  3. what you're trying to do is an idea i've also been considering but i really don't know how to implement it. i've succeeded using charles proxy on my laptop, but not with the involvement of the pineapple. below is what i've been using, and i've tested it with my smartphone devices. however, as i'm a totes n00b shitcunt, it could be entirely irrelevant to your circumstances:
  4. hi guys, so i'm supplying my pineapple with internet from my linux laptop via eth0. i figure this leaves me the opportunity to use both wlan0 and wlan1 on the pineapple as i please. i establish an SSH connection with the pineapple from the linux terminal, and i'm able to place wlan1 into monitor mode no problems. however! when i attempt to do likewise with the wlan0 atheros adapter, upon entering ifconfig wlan0 up the SSH connection drops. when i try to reconnect with via terminal, i get an error message until finally, about 30 seconds later, i can login and re-establish the connection. it's happened in excess of 10 times now; always with wlan0 and always when i try to put wlan0 up rather than down. can someone shed some light?
  5. i see. i am still very much a n00b, so pardon my ignorance: would this be a matter of coming up with a script that can decrypt packets shortly after having captured them, so that images would appear almost in real time? i have always had the belief that there is always a solution to a problem. if a solution is untenable, then you need to reconsider one of your assumptions or relax one of your constraints.
  6. yes. chris haralson, whom i believe has contributed to some of the pineapple video tutorials has a good tutorial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDhGpAZ5IGg
  7. hi guys, when it comes to SSLstrip on the pineapple, certain caveats notwithstanding, i think you need to set your sights on less lofty targets as facebook, gmail, et al.
  8. yep. i got a belkin bluetooth speaker adapter that plugs into the AUX input of my speakers. i was a tad annoyed at the range of the bluetooth, but found a tutorial video that suggested removing a small metal plate within the belkin adapter, which was easy to do and did improve signal range substantially. i'm not sure what your question is -- did you want to know if it's possible? if so, then certainly. the bluetooth adapter needs a small power supply, it's simiilar in appearance to those old nokia power adapters.
  9. after spending a good 5+ hours fucking around with all sorts of alleged fixes for this, i can confirm that the following worked for my NHA on VMware kali linux: http://dscallday96.wordpress.com/2013/08/14/maximizing-the-tx-power-of-alfa-awus036nha/
  10. things may not beas black and white as people here are presuming. for example: - who is actually paying for the internet? - have you had issues re: throttling which increased the relevancy about data downloads? - has the matter of massive downloading been raised before, and matters of denial occuring? this doesn't justify an invasion of privacy, but it creates a context wherein this "friend" of yours drops down a notch from being a total shit cunt to a plain old fashioned d1ck smoker. if he is the latter, i would personally hog tie him and subject him to no less than 48 hours of psychological and sexual humiliation e.g taking turns urinating on him and force feeding him his own excrement. but that's simply IMHO -_-
  11. out of curiosity, if MAC and SSID underpin the karma attack what could possibly be the basis of any defence against it? obliging GPS location within a particular range? same channel? speaking of revisions to karma in the works, i'd really love to have it accept probe requests for password protected networks. (if even tenable)
  12. you must forgive me for my n00bness, as well as my racial handicap, but as much as i'm into fucking myself real good, if you go randomising your MAC address, doesn't it make you susceptible to getting penetrated by your own device re the use of MAC address blacklisting/whitelisting?
  13. nonono! that's not my point -- in fact, i think it's the antithesis of the point i'm trying to make. at the end of the day, we're looking to get a wifi antenna so as to improve our wifi signal e.g. faster internet. even though we may choose the antenna with the highest dBi as a metric in improving our internet performance, antenna strength isn't isomorphic with download speed. to make my point by analogy -- choosing our antenna based on dBi might make as much sense as basing our choice in basketball draft on a player's height. sure, height is strongly correlated with performance, but it isn't the same thing. as a corollary, it may be better to look at the number of points they score per game as a measure of performance. again, points per game is an attempt to operationalise the concept of "performance" but it isn't the same thing as performance. likewise, what i wanted to know is if there is a group or resource that assesses the quality of a wifi antenna using a more tangible metric of performance e.g. download speed as measured on speedtest.net. diff'rent strokes n all
  14. as a man heavily steeped in the scientific method, i was wondering -- is anyone here aware of any groups that undertake performance tests of different wifi antennas and related geek paraphenalia? i'd like to get a wifi antenna, but i really would like to compare the performance of different ones to establish the relationship between purported specifications and actual, real world performance. if the testing is standardised, then comparisons over time would still be valid. on that note, let's say i was to do this myself, what would be the best metric for performance? i'm presuming something like speedtest.net, but perhaps there's an alternative that could be useful? and please... don't say number of bars
×
×
  • Create New...